“The Science” goes woke (again!)

"The Science" is getting political again, and institutions are torching their credibility in the process. I break it down in this episode of the Brad vs Everyone podcast. Plus, Hillary Clinton is back with a TERRIBLE take and another TikToker is mad about "misgendering" online. As always, I round out the show with YOUR comments.

00:00 Intro
00:48 "The Science" gets political (again!)
08:42 Hillary Clinton is BACK with an insane take
15:37 Another "misgendering" meltdown on TikTok
21:48 The comments
26:26 Outro

#bradpolumbo #podcast #politics

Sources:

[vdegamr]

To me, getting mad at a stranger for not knowing your pronouns is like getting mad at a stranger for not knowing your name.

[aniE]

Scientific America hasn't been very scientific for a very long time. I grew up reading this magazine, but it's turned into complete garbage.

[jlove]

Science magazines that take a political stance no longer have credibility to me.

[johnthesavage]

Every time Hillary gets om TV I remember to be thankful we dodged that bullet.

[JaredWilliams-lj]

Science is about facts. Politicizing facts is crazy to me

[adams]

Norm Macdonald once joked: "The voters hated Hillary so much they voted for someone they hated even more." Hillary just keeps on giving us reasons to despise her. I find it rich that she's on Rachel Maddow's show talking about misinformation when her campaign started the whole Russiagate allegation that turned out to be nothing, but was propagated by Maddow's show for 4 years. Hillary blamed everybody but herself for running a lousy campaign and being an unlikeable candidate with no message.

[prestonalexander]

As a Mathematical Physicist, I hate that science is becoming more political. It is infuriating that both the far left and far right say to trust the science until the science goes against their agenda. One of the biggest problems with covid was since the policies were miss handled it made everyone question the scientific process. Science is messy and not linear. Scientists are always changing their conclusions on matters if more data comes out that challenges the current narrative.

[pikadeb]

I do NOT understand these people!!! The Clintons, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Gates, etc, etc. They have more money than they could EVER need. Why don't they just retire and enjoy themselves???

[DJRazorgirl]

Scientific American - we're admitting that our content is paid for and biased by getting political.

[MTx]

Welp. I guess we made a good choice in not electing her 👍🏾

[kayeragdull]

It doesn't undermine their integrity. It reveals that they have sold their integrity and no longer deserve consideration.

[angiemaybe]

It is terrifying to me that opinions are now toted as facts.😳

[aniE]

Hilary still sounds butt hurt about loosing 2016.

[SR-rxpk]

BRAD! I love your show. I am a straight white female and I listen to a bunch of lgb youtubers. Your chanel is Great. My condolences for Reggie. My continued support for your success.

[RandallStevenson]

Russia Russia Russia!!! Could these overhyped infants please just give it a rest? "The boy who cried wolf" should've been a lesson to everybody since they were 5!

[MarigoldSundays]

I feel sorry for servers dealing with this crap. A server calls you “sir” or “ma’am” because they don’t know your name. That’s it! Not everything is an attack.

[pikadeb]

Uh, Hillary.... then you'd be in jail!!!!

[WizardToby]

Hot take: science shouldn't be political. The first one to get politicized is climate change and then all the vaccine stuff.

[pdxdon]

Hillary is the grift that keeps on grifting.

[malvoliosf]

15:50 — I think Brad is being naïve if he thinks people like that guy want people to see him as a woman. He wants a GRIEVANCE. He wants to be a victim, because that gives him power over other people, and without any corresponding responsibility.