Flightscope VS Bushnell / GC3 --- One Unit SUCKS!

This comparison is not sponsored in any way. I haven't been paid or given products for this test. I was shocked at the differences in the result. Like and comment if you enjoy these comparison style videos!

[PARKERBROTHERSPLUMBING]

You got your systems juiced up... Ain't no way that swing with a nine iron is going 200 yards.... You got a good swing but that's ridiculous

[rayyou]

Bushnell definately looks like its good for the ego cause it read longer shots but even not knowing your distances i doubt you were carrying Driver over 300 from your swings but who knows.

[midhc]

FS Mevo plus is more accurate indoors with ball markers or the Titleist balls. It’s cheaper and easier to carry around to the range. GC3 is out of reach for most with its cost. Your test was ridiculously biased.

[jumpsmcgee]

Flightscopes algorithm for distance on driver is less juiced than Foresight. I have a launch pro and Flightscope X3. If you GS Pro, it will take Flightscopes raw distance and use a more aggressive distance algorithm. On really low spinning shots, I think the foresight way overestimates distance vs Flightscope

[rodmarshallpga]

Using the Titleist driver performance charts as a reference shows that the Bushnell is over inflating your carry and distance given your ball speed, launch and spin on each shot. The Mevo plus is deflating marginally but is closer to the actual distances you should be seeing given the data.

[OnTheSnap]

The spin is more accurate with Mevo and the RCT ball

[davidkeith]

The radar unit is affected by electronic interference. Specifically a photo unit sitting right next to the ball.

[and]

9 iron above 100mph is kinda crazy. Club speed is measured at different points on different machines. I normally get lower on the mevo+ compared to a gc3 I have access too. Usually a longer carry on the GC. However, the mevo+ I trust more when I’m outdoors on the range. It tracks the complete ball flight. GC always has a calculation to preform but i do trust it more indoors.

[matthewobyrne]

Are you sure the ground conditions settings are similar? Seems flightscope has less run off

[Ocho]

You have enough speed to play more traditional lofted irons. That rogue 9 iron is like a tour players 6 or 7 iron.

[ScottyHongGolf]

Why are you using such jacked irons. You seem like you don’t need the help. It’s like a 35 degree 9 iron

[pgaurd]

How in gods name do you know the Bushnell is more accurate? How about a test outside with both monitors and someone actually seeing where they land and measuring the ACTUAL distances, not what you think they went!!! Also the radar can be affected by the BLPs placement. I am looking to but one of these but every review is inside.. I’d like to use it both in and out. Also what is the altitude set at?

[rickliners]

You do not specify which ball you are using. Mevo+ is optimized for the Titleist RCT ball. If you are using a regular ball then reads are going to be off on the Mevo+.

[ppierpont]

All this talk of “jacked” numbers and altitude misses the point. Why would you WANT your 9-iron to be your 195 yard club? So you can have 3-4 clubs with shorter yardages and 7-8 clubs with longer? That’s non-sense to give yourself only 2 or 3 club options from 150 and closer. Good luck scoring consistently.

[arnoldbpena]

Tough to trust a review from a dude that's clearly faking his numbers.

[ARCBA]

how is hitting a 9 iron 200 yards even useful...I think you need to check your lofts. Also you need to use RCT balls indoors to get proper spin on the Mevo

[nailsforbreakfast]

Is the driver shaft 48in with Krank LD 4*?

[danielpemberton]

How you smashing a 9 200 and and your driver just around 300 something isn’t right here. But a 200 yard 9 is nuts. Almost makes me not trust either.