What is a Cogent Argument? (Philosophical Definition)

preview_player
Показать описание
A basic description of a cogent argument and objections to its use in inductive logic due to issues with the Problem of the Priors. Including definitions of Strong and inductive arguments.

Sponsors: João Costa Neto, Dakota Jones, Thorin Isaiah Malmgren, Prince Otchere, Mike Samuel, Daniel Helland, Mohammad Azmi Banibaker, Dennis Sexton, kdkdk, Yu Saburi, Mauricino Andrade, Diéssica, Will Roberts, Greg Gauthier, Christian Bay, Joao Sa, Richard Seaton, Edward Jacobson, isenshi, and √2. Thanks for your support!

Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy and more!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I came across this video because of a godly band. Thank you for the information:) love to learn

AnOdinaryReaper
Автор

This brings me back to logic class. Cogency was one of those things I remember us talking about, but I can't remember specifically.

justinlacek
Автор

Thank you for Improving my logical consistency.

PowerMatrixAnime
Автор

Very good and funny videos bring a great sense of entertainment!

truongnguyen-dmts
Автор

Great video! Looking forward to learn more from your channel :)

adrianap
Автор

To me, the inductive arguments including strong and cogent sound like they are used in a court of law to determine the likelihood of someone's guilt. Would that be correct?

johngibson
Автор

Strength, cogency of an argument, Bayesianism - this all seems to lie more properly within the purview of psychology rather than philosophy. These are useful and important ideas, but it's not the same thing as examining the problem of induction, for example.

cliffordhodge
Автор

is the eating Mardi Gras case a valid argument?

kojenshoon_
Автор

Watch video about something other than AI for once. Ofc features bayesian theory.. :D

TheRealJackfrog