Full Virtualization vs. Paravirtualization: What's the Difference?

Full virtualization and paravirtualization are two popular types of server virtualization, differentiated primarily by the level of isolation they offer. With full virtualization, VMs don’t share any resources, don’t communicate, and are completely isolated. With paravirtualization, the disadvantages typically far outweigh the advantages, generally only used for niche or experimental use cases.

What do you think? Have you used paravirtualization? Tell us about your experiences in the comments below, and please hit that like button.

Related readings:

#FullVirtualization #Paravirtualization #ServerVirtualization

[リンゴ酢-bg]

VMWare, VirtualBox and KVM use full virtualisation

[haritha.s]

never seen the like button highlight itself when they tell us to click the like these people know how to use the features

[amirmohg]

from what I've known, Amazon uses para virtualization so we can't just generalize this and say para virtualization is for niche cases. I might be wrong here and I wouldn't mind being corrected by anyone who has more knowledge on this topic

[jankipatel]

thank you mam, can you exlain what is emulation virtualization ? i read on google but do not understand the concept please ...

[TechnoSan]

i have used full virtual machines like virtualbox, but para virtualization confuses me
but now as i know it's niche i don't care about para, thanks

[A]

way Docker containers yes and paravirtualization no? what the difference?

[RishiRaj-xjzb]

What is the point (just reading the facts, women I just need to know what's the actual difference)

[_modiX]

Thank you for helping to choose. So if I recall correctly, having a Docker container is paravirtualization, right?