Bart Ehrman's Hume-Doomed Argument Blunder 📚🤯🤔🙅‍♂️

Support Paulogia at

Paulogia Channel Wish-List

Paulogia Merch

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Paulogia Audio-Only-Version Podcast

Follow Paulogia at

Send me cool mail!

Paulogia
PO Box 1350
Lantz Stn Main, NS
B2S 1A0
Canada

[zigzagzaag]

Love it when Low Bar Bill has criticisms of highly-accomplished scholars.

[Rurike]

"He hasnt learned anything in the last 20 years"
Says the appologist with a list of arguments centuries old (generously)

[nrellis]

This is WLC's response to any argument or evidence opposed to his favoured myths: dismiss it as trivial without even pretending to think about it

[tye]

Low Bar Bill: "Bart still thinks 2 + 2 = 4. Obviously, Bart hasn't learned a new response to 2 + 2."

[matthewgagnon]

Low Bar Bill accusing other people of using old arguments is hilarious. They haven't really changed since Aquinas!

[fepeerreview]

I've never actually heard an apologist explain what is wrong with Hume's argument. They just say stuff like this as if it's universally understood and acknowledged, which it is NOT.

[DeludedOne]

WLC was given a chance to clarify exactly this in an interview with Cameron about the story of Apollonius of Tyana and you know what the coward did? He simply said something along the lines of how "factuality tells us that that story is a myth" (paraphrased).

No going into criteria and application of it compared to the Biblical miracles, nothing. WLC bravely ran away from the accusation that Ehrman leveled at him about how Craig would use the SAME standards that he does to assess miracles claims that are not associated with his religion when given the chance to respond to it.

[shriggs]

Craig is still offering that warmed over argument of the Kalam.Hmmm?

[XDRONIN]

Clearly, Bart Erhman needs to take classes from the Professional Historian and sometimes Scientist Dr. William Lane Graig, .. _wait_ Dr. William Lane Graig is NOT a Professional Historian and/or Scientist? _Shocking!!_ 😏😏

[MartTLS]

He’d believe anyone who claimed to have observed his god/Jesus because he would have no grounds to deny it . Talk about confirmation bias and special pleading.

[Ploskkky]

Craig is such a disappointing fool. When I was still a christian I used to look up to him. I can not even imagine that now.

[adamcosper]

Whereas the Kalam is the freshest argument around....

[cheeseman]

Dr. Barts got a great sense of humor!, he's da man!

[TheQuantumWave]

They know the truth, but their livelihood depends upon pretending the truth is the lie.

[simonthompson]

According to WLC anything that is supposedly miraculous must be believed? Sad.

[blairmcian]

"Bart Ehrman hasn't learn a thing in over twenty years." 😅🤣 'Dr.' Craig is increasingly clownish.

[aaronpolichar]

I'll take "warmed over Hume" of William Lane Craig any day.

[rationalsceptic]

Craig has no training in Ancient History so gets everything wrong historically and logically about the Bible

[WayWalker]

Why is it that when I hear WLC talking, that it reminds me of how good natured but very naive children think and talk?

[gutgod-ofxk]

Historical probability is determined by ability and motives. Pontius Pilate had them both when it came to removing the body of Jesus from the tomb. He wanted the extremely pro-Roman teachings of Jesus to continue, plus he wanted revenge on the religious leaders for forcing him to crucify Jesus. Ability + Motives = Historical Probability.