BBC Bias on Brexit AGAIN!

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

“Someone needs to go to the bbc and ask Laura why let that proven lie to be told!

seanroche
Автор

We couldn't have approved the vaccine without the rolling review data.
We got that data because we were in the ema.
There's no debate, EMA membership was vital to approving the vaccine.

verystripeyzebra
Автор

Yeah I saw that. Super frustrating wasn’t it!?
There’s no debate here!
The rollout had nothing to do with BREXIT.

monkeytron
Автор

Kuenessberg is not an honest actor, she has proved that time and time again.

erict.watson
Автор

brexiteers start campaigning for REFORM for our children's safety 🇬🇧 🇬🇧🇬🇧 this is our BATTLE OF BRITAIN FOR OUR CHILDREN'S SAFETY...vote REFORM VOTE REFORM 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 start campaigning on every platform 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

bmkbmk
Автор

Tories wanted brexit to avoid EU scrutiny law on offshore bank accounts.

Also, Rishi Sunak did a startup involving the Moderna vaccine, aka illegal insider trading.

Manu-Official
Автор

Ok even if you can’t get Laura to answer how about any bbc employee?

seanroche
Автор

So, Tony MP. Can you see the Brexit 'Benefits' in the room with us now...? 👻

lisastickytuna
Автор

I don't think the BBC is the villain here.

stephenpetermay
Автор

all the people who keep trying to get Britain back in the eu by propaganda and political shenanigans could just move to an eu country and live happy, im sure they could easily get residency

Andy-sheq
Автор

I think we should rerun the 1979 general election. I was too young to vote in it but I think Thatcher said some things beforehand that turned out to be untrue.

iainfitz
Автор

I believe in a system called proportional impartiality (you heard it here first) where the amount of air time given is proportional to the views of people who specialise in that field - for example giving air time to different parties in elections based off of the amount of people who voted for them, or giving 99% air time to scientists who believe in climate change and less than 1% to the scientists who don’t. This would solve the problem of the bbc being 50/50 on everything

MapperJD
Автор

Wow bro... you feel that much Englishness?!

issahussein
Автор

Very poor LK failing to challenge facts.

nicks
Автор

I'm glad to see you're still fighting the good fight Femi, Thank you for all your hard work bringing the truth to light.

kaira
Автор

Got to love Femi he has two brain cells and they are both battling for second place

olegunnersolskjaer
Автор

The issue is bias partly, possibly even mainly, but there are other issues at play too. My view is the important thing is Interviews are too short. There are too many panel shows rather than probing single interviews. The whole two sides thing means that the topic doesn’t get discussed as it often is just a shouting match with one side talking over the other, or lying.

Journalists (and most are not, they are presenters) are nearly always under prepared and often lack the critical skills and education required to interview robustly.

We seem to have lost nearly all the heavy hitting journalists. But we also lost politicians being willing to appear on their shows.

This isn’t entirely a left wing or right wing issue. Left wing media are just as bad for bias.

col.hertford
Автор

You're gonna be out at the next election,

Allthedifferentcheeses
Автор

God you’re still crying about Brexit? Give it a rest, you lost.

BAR-idyz
Автор

Dislike Don't recommend channel 👎

JAAshard