REAL LIFE Examples Used by ATTORNEYS in Court to get TRAFFIC TICKETS citations DISMISSED in Florida

preview_player
Показать описание
This video uses courtroom hearings streamed via zoom. These hearings contain attorneys who used Florida state statutes and traffic court rules in their cases.

All cases can be found here:

All information spoken, omitted, and heard is PUBLIC.
This is NOT legal advice and is for EDUCATIONAL purposes only.

0:00
30 over the speed limit
Dismissal due to defendant's missing signature on traffic ticket/citation.

1:00
Speeding ticket
Dismissal due to traffic ticket missing speed measuring device manufacturer on record
Law referenced by the attorney causing dismissal is below.

1:56
Speeding in a school zone
Dismissal due to officer failing to file speed measuring device information with the court
15B-2.013. Approved Speed Measuring Devices

8:54
Case was dismissed due to the officer not being present during the hearing.
Failing to ask the judge for dismissal will only cause the judge to continue the case giving the officer another opportunity to appear.

10:07
Case was dismissed due to the officer not being present during the hearing.
Failing to ask the judge for dismissal will only cause the judge to continue the case giving the officer another opportunity to appear.

12:36
Traffic accident
Case dismissed due to no witnesses present during the hearing

15:38
Case was dismissed due to the officer used the wrong statute for the infraction.

16:55
Speeding ticket
Case dismissed due to traffic ticket missing speed measuring device information.
Law referenced by the attorney causing dismissal is below.

"Copyright © The Law Chronicles, 2021. All Rights Reserved."

No part of this video or the information contained therein may be reproduced, modified, or distributed without the written consent of the representative(s) of The Law Chronicles.

NONE OF THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES, ITS OWNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONTENT PROVIDERS, AND AGENTS (ALL COLLECTIVELY HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS “THE LAW CHRONICLES”) ARE CONTENT CREATORS AND NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN IS INTENDED TO BE OR TO BE CONSTRUED AS FINANCIAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.

YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY. FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES DOES NOT PROMISE OR GUARANTEE ANY INCOME OR PARTICULAR RESULT FROM YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.

ANYONE WHO REPRESENTS THE LAW CHRONICLES WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, ACTUAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER DAMAGES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOSS OF REVENUE OR INCOME, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, OR SIMILAR DAMAGES, EVEN IF THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT WILL THE COLLECTIVE LIABILITY OF THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF THE LAW CHRONICLES TO ANY PARTY (REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE) EXCEED THE GREATER OF $100 OR THE AMOUNT YOU HAVE PAID TO THE REPRESENTATIVE(S) FOR THE INFORMATION, PRODUCT OR SERVICE OUT OF WHICH LIABILITY AROSE.

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL ANYONE WHO REPRESENTS THE LAW CHRONICLES AT ANY TIME BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY YOUR RELIANCE ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO EVALUATE THE ACCURACY. COMPLETENESS OR USEFULNESS OF ANY INFORMATION, OPINION, ADVICE, OR OTHER CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN. PLEASE SEEK THE ADVICE OF PROFESSIONALS, AS APPROPRIATE, REGARDED THE EVALUATION OF ANY SPECIFIC INFORMATION, OPINION, ADVICE, OR OTHER CONTENT.

Zoom Is a registered trademark by Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Every judge knows these cops are out there fishing for money and the damage it does with the Insurance Cartel in charge is out of proportion with the alleged wrongdoing.

maulrat
Автор

Mr. Laser Instructor got his ass handed to him....

tammyl.
Автор

8:35 the cop doesn't care. The $135 or whatever doesn't come out of his paycheck and in fact, he got paid to sit there.

Packer
Автор

Does anyone else watch these and think it would be fun to be a traffic lawyer?

djturnz
Автор

The first case is where the guy went 30 miles and over and didn’t sign anything and the case got dismissed is this this still a valid thing?

OpTiiMiisTiiK
Автор

The judge is on the same side as the attorney and lawyer and cop.judges have an insurance policy fund that for every felony or mistominor they get money for those

bradlybaldwin
Автор

Never get legal advice from BAR attorneys. Always demand the court show standing. No standing no jurisdiction its that easy

bluesky
Автор

The price to hire these attorneys probably far exceeds the price of the fines...so how exactly are they helping people?

angelmeyers
Автор

LOL, I motioned to dismiss my parking ticket in Seattle (head-in parking in a back-in parking space) because the parking enforcement officer was not present. The judge refused to dismiss - I was given a $10 discount in exchange for waiting 3 hours in the courthouse lobby.

davidinwashington
Автор

@23:44 ~ Seems like this lawyer was afraid to ask for dismissal. Maybe he’s too nice or he’s just not used to judges being willing to dismiss over technicalities. I don’t know. But the other lawyers were ready to ask for dismissal if somebody coughed at the wrong time. Lol. And it seemed like the judge basically had to beg this lawyer to ask for dismissal.

iMatti
Автор

Do established lawyers want to be traffic lawyers, Do they just do it for the extra money, or do they do it because they were unsuccessful other places so had to do the easiest type of law? I’m not asking this to be nasty or anything whatsoever, I’m just really curious. It’s not like my career is any more prestigious than theirs, I’m not even a lawyer so they have me beat already. I’m just really curious. Does anybody know?

iMatti