BATTLE OF KINGS! -- 2023 Mazda CX-50 vs. 2022 Toyota RAV4: Comparison

Join us as we compare the ALL-NEW 2023 Mazda CX-50 vs. the 2022 Toyota RAV4, which has also been refreshed this year to make it even more competitive. While the RAV4 is the best-selling non-pickup truck, has the Mazda CX-50 dethroned the segment leader?? Go ahead: CLICK to find out :) Also, be sure to LIKE, SUBSCRIBE and tap the notification bell if you enjoyed this review -- it helps us more than you can imagine!
#toyotaRAV4 #mazdaCX50 #carconfections

Also, follow us for shorter form content on our other social media!
TikTok: @carconfections
Instagram: car_confections

© Car Confections, LLC 2022. All rights reserved.
“Sampling the Latest Automotive Delicacies!”

[Jeff-sknl]

I went with the CX-50, can’t understate how outdated the RAV4 interior feels in 2022 especially with that infotainment system. Lack of power passenger seat too was a big negative for me too

[chrislamb]

We were close to choosing the Rav4 but when I saw the CX50 on a local lot-it was like love at first sight!! The Mazda looks beautiful & DRIVES beautifully!! She's the whole package! We love it! (Aimee)

[joseph]

Hey CC, so glad I guys did a review between the two. The rav4 has always been my favorite since this gen came out however the CX-50 has it beat in style, tech and luxury. If I were shopping in this class I would get the CX-50.

[josesicairos]

The effort that went into videotaping each car symmetrically is beautiful. Well done!

[jaimieconroy]

I like both the Mazda CX 50 and the Toyota Rav4, but not everyone can afford the top trim. could you please compare the basic models for those who don't want to break the bank to afford a new car.

[romdezhegu]

In my humble opinion, I think you guys did a great job comparing both cars and even when Toyota's RAV4 has a better fuel effiency figures, I would go for the Mazda CX-50. I love it!!! The color, the interior, the performance and all makes me go buy the Mazda!

[RajGuendoo]

Proud owner of a new CX-50 Premium Plus Turbo in Polymetal! I test drove an RDX Advance/A-Spec, RAV4 Prime and coming from a 2018 BMW X3 3.0. Chose the CX50 because it came the closest to BMW's performance and handling. Great low end torque and power and very fun to drive! Love the premium interior materials and features. RAV4 Prime felt outdated and cheap despite all the efficiency features of the PHEV. RDX was not as impressive as I was expecting especially coming from BMW. Very happy with it!

[danielhigle]

I would go with the CX-50. I currently own a CX-9 GT and rented a Toyota Highlander Hybrid. While the Highlander was more fuel efficient, the CX-9 is DEFINITELY more fun, the interior is much more luxurious, and it is much better in the snow.

[GregAllen]

Thank you very much for the video! I really appreciate the direct split screen comparison between the two vehicles features. I test drove the turbo CX-50 recently and it was very enjoyable to drive. One important feature that you guys left out is towing capacity. As someone that enjoys camping and owns a teardrop camper I need a vehicle that has some towing abilities which rules out most vehicles in this class. Unfortunately many vehicles in this segment sacrifice power for fuel efficiency which takes away from there overall utility...

[tonelocrian]

That was a tight race & substantial review. The styling & handling of the Mazda wins for me - but the RAV4's cargo space & efficiency would make it more practical ultimately.

[ejfmmusic]

For the money, the CX-50 got my vote. I'm glad I picked it - you feel like you're in something much more expensive. Whilst design is subjective, the quality, and ergonomics of the Mazda cabin are a lot better than the Toyota. I didn't like the Rav-4 much when I drove it, however the fuel economy is hard to argue with. The Mazda in real-world driving gets about 20 - 25MPG around the city (LA) and with fuel prices... it's a bit brutal.

However, for a car to go on road trips and to transport friends, the Mazda is a fantastic car.

A note on the speakers - whilst they both product good sound - the Mazda system can go full volume without distortion or vibration from the rest of the car - making for a really pleasing a crisp experience. I found the Rav-4 had panel vibrations and higher audio sounds. So if you like loud music, or are a bit of an audiophile - then the Mazda is the clear pick.

[SeamlessVideography]

I purchased rhe CX-50 over the RAV4 and i love it!! Handling is great, power, style, is fun. Off roading is off the scales.

[wayneyim]

Even though the Rav4 hybrid has more fuel efficiency, I would still pick the CX-50. Once the CX-50 hybrid (with Toyota's powertrain) comes out on the market, it's going to blow the competitors away.

[Youk]

Thank you for posting this video. I'm in the market for a new vehicle and have my list narrowed down to the cx-50 and the Rav4. I think a fair comparison would have been between the cx-50 GT Non-Turbo (or premium plus non-turbo) and the Rav4 Limited (non-hybrid). The price of these two vehicle trims is comparable. Of course the fuel efficiency of the hybrid will be much better than a turbo engine and an unfair comparison. Plus the 12-14 month waitlist for a hybrid Rav4 is insane. When comparing the 2.5L gas engine fuel efficiency in both these vehicles the Rav4 is slightly better but not significantly. According to Consumer Reports, Mazda has ranked top manufacture for reliability for the past 2 years and getting better. We finally decided upon the cx-50 for our next vehicle. Luxury, comfort, technology, modern style, handling, and leather were big factors. Plus the manual passenger seat with no height adjustment in the Rav4 (other than in their top trim) was a show stopper for me. Come on Toyota, get with it. I couldn't get in the passenger side of the Rav4 without hitting my head. I'm a long time Toyota customer and have absolutely zero complaints about their reliability and service, great vehicles. Even though the cx-50 is a new vehicle in the Mazda line-up, it's not new Mazda technology (other than the panoramic sun roof). Mazda is coming out with the CX-50 in hybrid in the near future sourcing Toyota hybrid technology built in the same plant as the Toyota. That would be a neat comparison that I'm looking forward to. I don't think you can go wrong with either of these vehicles, pros and cons for both, it's just that the cx-50 checked all the boxes for me.

[itsatrap]

I really like the style of the CX-50(Mazda).

[smoopmuz]

Like both but when I went to test drive both, the Mazda dealership was selling for sticker and the Toyota dealership wanted $5, 000 over sticker. Went with the Mazda.

[michaeltolsdorf]

The CX-50 is my choice hands down. It can compete with any other crossover regardless of msrp.

[enabulujames]

The points given to Mazda on having a wireless apple and Android should be 1, also on head on display 1. These are very important technologies in modern day vehicles.
One love from Nigeria 🇳🇬

[raulsuazo]

Great way to compare using split screen. Excellent job guys. Btw, Mazda its a clear winner here.

[justinroe]

I just got a premium plus non turbo cx 50. I love it. I'm not a speed demon so I didn't really need to spend another 3k on the turbo and I am getting 31 mpg which is fine for me. This is now my 4th Mazda. 2 were when they shared parts with Ford and those weren't great but since Mazda is all in house now they are fantastic vehicles.