This is Watson — The Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University

The Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University seeks to promote a just and peaceful world through research, teaching, and public engagement.

[rjhaveribh]

Q9. The 1947 riots were engineered by the British but not taught in any school books, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar (a sufi muslim), his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used our own corrupt people to divide India, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in the battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler against his own state. Did the British actually fool the Indians and Pakistani by placing own proxy agents to rule respective countries this remote controlling India and Pakistan for their own vested interest. Were the 1 million people who died in 1947 riots used as collateral damage by the British. A debate and research should be encouraged in the university on these topics. Should the British be forced to classify all the documents related to Indian and pakistani independence/ dominion status. We believe there was no real independence given it was only dominion status. Since Jinnah and Nehru were onboard the British plan it was easy to fool the people of India and Pakistan. And so till date this arrangement continues with congress party, pakistan army and the British. University should encourage research and debate on the subject.

[rjhaveribh]

A white American recently told me that most Christian and western countries provide high quality education and opportunities for Indians, Asians and Africans. He said West provides so many jobs to Indians, you should be happy.

So below was my response to him and I hope Indian and Indian Americans can learn something from my response.

I have different prospective, please excuse for giving you my views.
If education is offered free to black and asian students it is a service to humanity and also meant to give equal opportunities to the socially deprived but when it is chargeable to make money it is no longer service, then it is called a business for self benefit. Many asian / african come to foriegn lands they pay very high fees due to prospects of opportunities, because their own nations are too poor and has less resources.

As an Indian son wants to do masters degree in USA, he wants to specialize in Financial engineering he has the ability but he does not have the affordability to afford the expensive US education. I wrote to Georgia Institute of Technology if they had any grants and scholarship for poor nations like India they said no. So the cost of attendance at Georgia institute of technology or similar premier university for an Indian is around USD 55000 per year for a 2 years master it is USD 110, 000 and for a under graduate 4 years degree it will cost USD 440, 000, And average Indian cannot even afford 10% of that. So the students who come to USA are usually children of extremely rich or corrupt politicians. USA or any western nation does not help Asians or Africans, they only accept extremely rich kids. In asia you have to be corrupt of politicians to afford such education or a very very rich family.
USA only needs India extremely brilliant children who can be of use to USA in NASA, or similar projects that benefit USA. No rich nation helps poor nation out of compassion for humanity, This is how world has been. The many Indians who come to India come by selling every thing they have in home country thus taking huge risks. Many parents who send Indian kids dont leave anything for own retirement.

Indians who come to USA, may or may not contribute to India but they become entrepreneurs, open businesses and create jobs and opportunities for Americans. Often they forget their home country to pursue comfortable life in USA. Often it is said that Indians take away American jobs, but the reality is completely to the contrary the Indians make USA what it is and competitive against china and Russia. Many Indians who come to USA become loyal to America cause what they remember about India is not positive they only remember poverty. Those who were already rich also want to expand businesses to USA. Indians integrate easily with other Americans compared to other nationalities. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) students have high demand in USA (IIT is the MIT of India), In India each IIT student gets subsidy by Indian tax payer but 70% of them get offered job by US companies like NASA etc. Despite attracting the brightest Minds to USA, India still fast catch up with US in Space and rocketry and satellites. The reason for that is India has more high IQ students than the complete population of USA. If today USA were to ban Indian immigrations it would certainly mean end of USA dominance in the world as a leader in technology. And with more brightest minds returning to India would mean India will catchup with USA/China much faster as the worlds most advanced nation. The problem past govts of India, they did not see this as a problem they were happy to export the brightest minds rather then compete with USA. They were not increasing Indian GDP but rather happy to export our scientists and engineers to help middle east, UK and USA improve their own GDP. Is this lack of vision of Indian leadership or is this a deliberate plan of the govts of the to past to keep India raw so they can keep looting the resources of India. Well many believe that the later is true our congress party of India was planted by the British in 1947, everything the congress did was to benefit the British. The congress party created licenses so only their own preferred persons got licenses to do business and they did not create opportunities in India. Hence most of the brilliant minds left India. This is why 70% of IIT graduate are in USA contributing to USA success.
Must watch these 2 videos for educating yourself (All Indians and Indian Americans must watch)


more how Indians contribute to India

Japanese Scientist Dr Michio Kaku praises INDIAN Education system and speaks how America benefits from India brain drain..


I personally wrote to USA universities several of them, we asked due to covid19 many people lost jobs would they be able subsidize fee for Indian students whose parents lost jobs. This email response from USA Georgia tech university forget about tuition fee waiver they will not even give a application fee waiver to Indian students. So you see rich countries do not give anything free to poor nations. They only take from us to become more rich.


When citizens of certain Islamic nations come to western nations they produce 6-12 children and they feed on your tax payer benefits, they claim free health care. When Indians come to west they create companies they create job, they contribute not become burden to the nation.

USA best Asian allies in last 6 decades are Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey.
For the last 5 decades Turkey Pakistan Saudi has been recipient of highest military aid from USA. Pakistan gets weapons from USA. All these 3 countries.
use these weapons against India in particular Pakistan . What USA done recently they gave Afghanistan and military weapons to Pakistan by handing over Afghanistan to Taliban. It is these countries who do everything possible to keep India weak.

USA academia, social media, bigtech and media being funded and bribed by china, turkey, saudi, qatar, pakistan uae to spew hinduphobia



And USA knows exactly what is happening but it will just remain quite. This happens with full blessing of USA.


Most importantly what USA invests in is dismantle Hindutva or Hinduism ( which is sponsored by most of USA universities).

Indian students full pay expensive fees so study in USA they contribute to American economy and this is how USA pays back by dismantle Hindutva or Hinduism.


Mark Zukerberg has said this many times he will protect the interest of Muslims. This itself is strange cause why then he never spoke for Jews or Hindus or other religious groups who are also targets of hatred on media. we already know this this is not new thing. He has commented to protect muslim interest a million times. Has he ever talked about protecting Jewish or Hindu interest then why only muslim interest is important for him cause he is funded by muslims groups. Rich people from Saudi and Qatar are investing heavily in American and European Media companies and Infrastructure companies.


Meanwhile the moment you complain about anti hindu hate groups on facebook or twitter you will get blocked for posting against hindu hatred.

If you read this comment from top to bottom, there will be no doubt in your mind who is funding Hinduphobia in USA, There will be no doubt in your mind how Universities have joined hands with China, Saudi, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey to spread Hinduphobia in USA. There will be no doubt in your mind how hatred is being harness in USA universities since several decades.

[alliesteamc]

Where is Watson institute and Briwn University located?

[rjhaveribh]

Q4. Can the University explain why it is not possible to ban the sale Quran in USA and UK due to these clauses or atleast remove these verses before the sale of Quran. What is the legal issue, is there a legal or constitutional problem if we remove these verses from all Qurans that are sold in the USA/ UK. Can there be debate on this topic in the University

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned;

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah"

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush,

Quran (2:191-193)
And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing . . . but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshiping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun [the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.].

Quran (2:216)
Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.

Quran (4:74)
Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.

Quran (4:76)
Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan: feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan.

Quran (4:89)
They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (from what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.

Quran (4:104)
And be not weak-hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain . . .

Quran (5:33)
The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement.

Quran (8:39)
And fight with them until there is no more fitna and religion should be only for Allah.

Quran (8:59-60)
And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.

Quran (8:65)
O Prophet! urge the believers to war; if there are twenty patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a hundred of you they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they are a people who do not understand.

Quran (9:5)
So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.

Quran (9:29)
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Quran (9:30)
And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!

Quran (9:38-39)
O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.

Quran (9:123)
O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.

Quran (18:65-81) (lays the groundwork for more violent conduct)

Quran (33:60-62)
If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, we verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.

Quran (47:3-4)
Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord . . . So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives) . . . If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.

Quran (48:29)
Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves.

[rjhaveribh]

12. Below are some Random points from Sahi Bukhari & Sahi Muslim the most sacred books of Islam that are ignored by all muslims

1. Umar bin khattab is the same man, who
Swore to kill Prophet mohd before converting to Islam
2. During Prophet Muhammad's Last Sermon, on the 9th of Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH in the Uranah valley of Mount Arafat, during the Islamic pilgrimage of Hajj. Prophet Mohammed announced his successor as Ali and Umar promised in that meet to support Ali, but soon after this joined hands with the 1st caliph Abu Bakr ignoring the promise given to the prophet..
3. Islamic prophet mohd was poisoned did not die a natural death, even as he only ate at aiysha house only nobody questioned aiysha, they blamed jew women for this.
Prophet mohd was bleeding from the head and his teeth was broken. Hamza and Ali fought to save him, hamza gave his life but Abu ‘Obaydah, Omar, Abu bakr and Uthman fled and then returned to medina after 3 days. At the time of death prophet mohd asked something to write his last will but he was denied by umar.
4. 90% Muslims ignore that the last sermon of prophet mohd, where he clearly said ali is to be respected as equal to the prophet, he said people to follow him and his family. Umar bin khattab was present at this sermon agreed to support Imam Ali in front of the prophet and the entire crowd of muslims.
5. When Prophet appointed a new general for his army he asked umar and abu bakr to go to syria but they both disobeyed prophets orders and refused to go.
6. Umar was not present at the funeral of the Prophet of Islam. He was brawling with the Ansar in the outhouse of Saqifa when the body of the Prophet was being buried It is he who was responsible to make abu bakr to make abu bakr the 1st caliph against the wishes of the prophet.
7. nowhere muslims can prove that abu bakr was nominated as 1st caliph of islam by mohd, muslims cannot show me even one proof of that. which proves abu bakr hijacked the wishes of prophet mohd and islam itself. whenever you ask sunni scholars they give vague reasons, show vague verses like abu bakr was asked to lead a prayer, this is not same as black and white declare him as successor.
8. Soon after the death of prophet, broke all the treaties with neighbours which were made by prophet himself and attacked sysanaids and byzantine empire.,
9. abu bkar sent umar to fatima home to force her and ali to accept abu bakr as the 1st or new caliph of islam, but fatima disapproved him. this is why umar burned her home and kicked her stomach while she was pregnant. This caused her abortion which lead to her death and death of her unborn baby . Fatimah was killed as a result of injuries sustained when her house was attacked and burned by Umar.
10. All the kins of prophet family were butchered / murdered by muslims. nobody can deny this. When I say muslims they were related to the caliphs.
11. uthman the third caliph kept non muslim cousins for collect of zaqat taxes, what was his purpose, this is why muslims of alexandria killed him.
12. uthman himself said all the persons who knew quran bye heart had died in war so there was need to collect the verses of the quran verse by verse, which he collected on scribes and then burned the originals. also dont forget the goat ate the last copy of quran.
13. at karbala muslims caliphate leaders and their relatives.killed grandchildren of mohd.
14. when imam hussain escaped arabia before that he sent his family and companions to kingdom of raja dahir a hindu king, the hindus give them refuge and shelter. ungrateful muslims will not even accept this. Proof of hindus fighting for Imam Hussain is there till today Dayar E Hind still exists in memory of the hindu martyrs.
15. after the killer muslims killed imam hussain in karbala, hejaj bin yusuf who killed at least 4 companions of prophet mohd sent mohd bin qasim to attack raja dahir and sind to kill prophets family. but muslims of pakistan and india call mohd bin qasim their hero which means you are followers of yazid.
16. For 1000s of years Hussaini brahmins have existed and their stories narrated in Sindh generation after generation. Persian books like Chachnama talk about the Raja dahir story. Sindhi have written books about this.
17. Umar pierced the pages of the Quran onto the spears to motivate muslims to fight the persians.

18. The prophet on his deathbed, he asked the companions to bring pen, paper and ink so he might dictate his will but Umar defied him. He did not let the Apostle dictate his will and testament.
19. The Banu Umayya were the traditional champions of idolatry and the arch-enemies of Muhammad and his clan, the Banu Hashim. Muhammad had broken their power but Umar revived them. The central component of his policy, as head of the government of Saqifa, was the restoration of the Umayyads. He turned over Syria to them as their “fief, ” and he made them the first family in the empire.
20.When Syria, Jordan and Palestine were conquered, Umar appointed Enemy of prophet, Yazid bin Abu Sufyan the governor of Syria
21. When Yazid bin Abu Sufyan, the governor of Syria, died in the plague of 18 A.H. When Umar heard the news of his death, he went to see Abu Sufyan to offer condolences to him. But Abu Sufyan interrupted Umar's commiseration, and asked him, “Whom are you going to appoint governor of Syria in place of my late son, Yazid?” Umar said: “Of course, his brother, Muawiya.
There are so many incidents like this mentioned in Sahi Muslim and Sahi Bhukhari about Umar.
Whenever this questions raise the standard answer is this is shia propaganda then why are the sunnis follow the books of Sahi Bhukhari and Sahi Muslim that mention these facts.
There is no fire without smoke, the while episode of fitna seems like a conspiracy against ahl-bayt.
Aksi points to note Quresh tribe 2% took over 80% ansaar tribe. Iran khomeni has to be arab cannot be persian. Abu bakr says all weath rights for wife aysha nothing for fatima


The reign of each of the caliphs did not last long, there was a rebellion within 20 days of Abu Bakr announcing himself as caliph.
Abu Bakr's era: 632–634
Umar's era: 634–644
Uthman's era: 644–656

So can we say Islam was hijacked soon after the death of Mohammed by the caliphate Abu Bakr, Umar and Usman. Could it be possible there was corruption in Quran and death of Mohammed and his kind deliberate attempts to seize power.

[rjhaveribh]

Q3. Why dont we encourage research of the below Hadith which opens up many possibilities to prove that source of all religions is same.
Remarkably, Prophet Muhammad has himself declared in a hadith written 1000s of years ago, “There was a very powerful prophet/messenger of God in Hind who is dark in color and his name was Kahan [Krishna]” (History of Hamadan Dailmi Chapter Al-Kaaf). Some critics allege this is not a Sahih (authentic) hadith, and while their assessment could be valid, their conclusion that the hadith should be discarded is invalid. Basic Islamic jurisprudence holds that if a hadith does not contradict the Quran, then it may be accepted as valid. As mentioned earlier, nothing in the Quran, Sunnah or Hadith declare that Lord Krishna was not a prophet of God. Thus, Prophet Muhammad’s testimony provides clear guidance of Lord Krishna’s status in Islam — that of a prophet. In fact, a renowned early 19th century Muslim scholar, Muhammad Qasim Nanotwi also was of the opinion that considering the evidence and this hadith, Lord Krishna was a true Prophet of God (Dharam Parchar Pg 8 & Debate Shah Jahan Pur Pg 31).


Also if prophet of Islam has said that messenger of Allah has been sent to all people in their own language, then why did people of Hindustan or America find the need to follow the messenger that was sent arabs, did allah not send them messenger to everyone in their own language. Why then do muslims insist to only follow their prophet Mohammed. And can any muslim prove that the messenger who came to Hindustan had a different message of Allah. Did each messenger give message of a different Allah, as per the quran. Can muslims show from Quran if allah gave instructions specifically to the Hindustani muslims that you should only follow the prophet of the arabs who speaks in arabic and denounce the other prophet sent in your region. Then why such debate should not happen in the University



Sanatan Dharma or Vedic religion is a 10000 year old civilization Many stories of bible and quran are taken as it is or by just changing character names from the vedas written much much before the respective books. You should know In Sanatan dharma Indian civilization we had toilets with water flushes when Islam/Christianity was not even born. Infact the followers of Islam destroyed the ancient sites of Hindus upon occupation. Can there be debate in the university to this specific point.

[rjhaveribh]

Q12. It is said that all of the Kins and bloodline of prophet Mohammed was killed by Muslims can there be debate and research on the subject.

Do you know Imam Zaynut Abadein, the direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 25th of Muharram in Medina by order of Husham Ibn Abdul Malik a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Mohammad Al-Badr, direct bloodline of the prophet was murdered by poisoning him on the 7th of Dhul-Hajja in Medina by order of Ibrahim, a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Jaafar Al-Sadiq, direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 25th of Shawwal by order of Al-Mansoor, a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Musa Al-Kadhun, direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 25th of Rajab in the prison of Harun Al-Rashid in Baghdad, a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Ali ibn Musa Al-Ridha, direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 17th of Safar in In Khurasan, Iran by the orders of Ma'Mun, a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Mohammad al-Taqi Al-Jawad, direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 30th of Dhul-Qa'da by the orders of Mu'tasim in Baghdad, a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Ali Al Naqi, direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 3rd of Rajab in Samirra (Iraq) by the orders of Mutawakkil, a Muslim.

Do you know Imam Hasan Al Askari, direct bloodline of Prophet Mohammed was murdered by poisoning him on the 8th of Rabi'ul-Awwal in Samirra (Iraq) by the orders of Mutamid, a Muslim.

It was due to prophets family being persecuted in Arabia, Imam hussain decided to take refuge with his hindu relatives, He first sent his family and companions to hindustan first then we tried to quietly flee Arabia but he was killed in Karbala mid way. Who were the real beneficiaries of Islam was it Yazid who become the Beneficiary of Islam.

[rjhaveribh]

Q11:Audrey and Hindu haters like her provide no references or block herself from debating with reputed hindu scholars yet she claims her research is factual
Whereas I provide below facts and Islamic references for the killing of Fatima by Islamic calph Umar bin Khattab, yet she will ignore these references.

[1] Tafseer'e Ayyashi, volume 2 page 307
[2] Al Milalo was Nihal, volume 1 page 57
[3] Al Imamah was Siyasah, volume 1 page 20; Al Mustarshid, page 377/378
[4] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 250
[5] Al Hidayatul Kubra, page 407; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 53 page 19
[6] Ash Shafi by Sayyed Murtaza, volume 3 page 241
[7] Al Hidayatul Kubra, page 407; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 53 page 19
[8] Wahi Mudrak page 178/179 and pade 407; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 53 page 13
[9] Tafseer'e Ayyashi, volume 2 page 67; Al Ikhtesas, page 176
[10] Dalaelul Imamah, volume 2; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 30 page 294
[11] Muattamire’ Ulamae’ Baghdad, page 63
[12] Kaukabe' Durriyah page 194-195
[13] Al Hidayatul Kubra, page 178/179
[14] Dalaelul Imamah, volume 2; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 30 page 294
[15] Al Hidayatul Kubra, page 407; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 53 page 19
[16] Dalaelul Imamah, volume 2; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 30 page 294; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 30 page 349; Al Hidayatul Kubra, page 179/407; Al Mukhtasar, page 44/45. As per some traditions, these crimes were committed when Hazrat Ali (as) was being dragged away. Refer Kaukabe' Durriyah page 195
[17] Al Hidayatul Kubra, page 407
[18] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 74
[19] Shar'he Nahjul Balagha, volume 2 page 57 and volume 6 page 49
[20] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 74; Rejaale’ Kashi, volume 1 page 37; Al Ihtejaj, page 73; As Seraat Al Mustaqeem, volume 3 page 25; Kaukabe' Durriyah, volume 1 page 194-195
[21] Al Iezaah, page 367; Basaerud Darajat, page 275; Tafseer'e Ayyashi, volume 2 page 67; Ash Shafi volume 3 page 244; Al Ikhtesas, page 11/186/275; Al Mustarshid, page 371; Al Manaqeb, volume 2 page 247; Shar'he Nahjul Balagha, volume 6 page 45
[22] Shar'he Nahjul Balagha, volume 2 page 50
[23] Kaukabe' Durriyah, page 194/195
[24] Ilmul Yaqeen, volume 2 page 677
[25] Seeratul Aimmah Isna Ashar, volume 1 page 145
[26] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 75; Al Ihtejaj, page 73; The breaking of her ribs has also been reported in other narrations like Sulaym Ibne' Qays, volume 2 page 907; Amali Sudooq, page 114 (Beirut print, page 100); Al Fazael, page 9; Al Mukhtasar, page 61-109; Behaarul Anwaar, volume 1010 page 44; Faraedus Simtayn, volume 2 pahe 35; Irshadal Qoloob, page 295
[27] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 134; Al Kashkul by Aamili, page 73/74; Hadeeqatush Shiah; page 30; Kaukabe' Durriya, volume 1 page 194/195
[28] Ilmul Yaqeen, volume 2 page 676/677
[29] Al Kashkul, page 73/74; Hadeeqatush Shiah; page 30
[30] Al Ihtejaj, page 27; Jalael Uloom by Sayyed Shobbar, volume 1 page 193
[31] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 74 and page 250; Kamil Bahai, volume 1 page 305; Jannatul Jolood, page 19
[32] Janatul Aasemah, page 252; Ash Shams Az Zoha, page 154
[33] Masaebal Ma’soomeen, page 127 and in many of the books whose names will be provided.
[34] Sulaym Ibne' Qays, page 75; that the other were crying is also found in Al Imamah was Siyasah, volume 1 page 20; Al Mustarshid, page 377/378



References:

Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 2, Page 1009, 1072.
Fathul Baari, Vol. 12, Page 145, Hadith no. 6830, Vol. 13, Page 208, Hadith no. 7219
Musnad Ahmad ibni Hambal, Vol. 1, Page 55, Hadith 133, Page 121, Hadith 391
Kanzul Ummal, Vol. 5, Page 635, 643-657, Hadith no. 14131-14156
Raudhul Unuf, Sharah Seerah ibni Hisham, Vol. 4, Page 260
Albidayah wan Nihaayah, Vol. 5, Page 245-252, Vol. 6, Page 301-303, Vol. 7, Page 331
Alkaamil fit Taarikh li ibni Atheer, Vol. 2, Page 189-194
Taarikh ul Islam lith Thahabi, Page 5-14, Page 639-642
Hum Sunni kiyun Hain, Page 233-248
Shia ke Hazaar Sawaal ka Jawaab, Page 291
‘Abaqaat of Allamah Khalid Mahmood

Article provided by : Hesham Merchant

[ravirana]

Please stop sponsoring hate to a micro minority in your country . Stop hindu hate . So this what you teach in university.

[rjhaveribh]

Q1. Can your university explain the what is the mental state of Audrey Truske/ Abhijit Sarkar who is fascinated by Aurangzeb a Mughal King. When it is clear in History that Aurangzeb confined his father and mother in his own palace at Agra. In consolidating his power, Aurangzeb caused one brother's death and had two other brothers, a son, and a nephew executed. He got his sister poisoned. Aurangzeb also sent his captive father the decapitated head of his eldest brother, Dara Shikoh, who was Shah Jahan's (Aurangzeb father) favourite son. He done all this due to greed for power. I also want to ask what is the logic of Rutger management who does not take any action against Audrey Truske despite her Hinduphobia, bigotry and racist remarks is allowed to teach in Rutger. Audrey Truske claimed Hindu god Ram is anti women, All Hindus are cow pee drinkers but she claims the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb who killed Hindus is a role model and she is very impressed with Aurangzeb. Does she have any concrete evidence for her claims of she is just generalizing. She has all the qualities of a metally lunatic person do we want our children to study in a University where such professors are allowed to teach and promote hatred toward hindu religion. So do we want our children to have such role models and do we like our children to make fake claims about other religions. Can the University have a public debate on this subject.

Taking about Urine lets establish some facts about Urine:

Cow urine has been granted US patent No 5896, 907&6, 410, 059 for its medical properties particularly as a bioenhancer antifungal, anticancer agent.

Where as even Horse urine is used in allopathy medicines. Still your university professors dont have issues with allopath medicines. You happily eat allopathy medicines.

Now in contrast Muslims have been command by their prophet Mohd to drink camel urine but 99% muslims dont follow the prophets command. Proof of this is Sahi Bhukhari vol 1 verse 234 where camel urine was clearly prescribed to some sick people but saudi has sent a notification not to drink camel urine after it was learned that camel urine is toxic and further also cause for spread of MERS virus.

So can I take it that your university professors are not allergic to Horse pee and Camel pee, but the Cow pee excites them more some how into bigotry.

[rjhaveribh]

Q5. Reality of Casteism in Hinduism is very different then what is provided in translated books and why we are forced to continue to study these mistakes in translations. Yet we judge a religion based on bad translation rather than trusting the translations given by its followers. Could there be a debate in the subject matter what was the reason why British required to do fake translations around the time of 1857 Indian revolution using Germans and Thomas Babington Macaulay. Could there have been a possibility these bad translations were done purposely for defaming the religion due to vested interests of the British. Why must we use the work of tainted foriegn translators not acceptable to the followers of the religion. Could there have been some ulterior motives in doing this from the west. Why dont we allow this topic open to debate in the University.



Reality of the Hindu Caste System : Explained!!

@
Caste and Hinduism Explained

@
The History of Hindu India, From Ancient Times

@

[rjhaveribh]

Recently one hindu girl Nipur Sharma quoted a verse from the Sahi Bhukhari and 1.4 million Jihadis from 56 countries came to the streets to do Jihad against Hindus.


Sahih Al-Bhukhari 5134, book 67, hadith 70
Sahih Al-Bhukhari 5134, book 67, hadith 70









If_M