Brandenburg v. Ohio Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Brandenburg v. Ohio | 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
The First Amendment right to freedom of speech encompasses one of America’s most divisive and hotly debated subjects: the advocacy of violence for political purposes. Does the First Amendment protect politically motived incitement to violence? Does it matter if the speaker’s politics are motivated by hate? The United States Supreme Court considered these questions in Brandenburg versus Ohio.

Have Questions about this Case?

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:

casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

[RadDadRob]

This is a really good video and well done. Thank you for taking time to make something educational even if its not going to get a million views.

[mikemartinez]

Briana Boston: Woman charged with threatening healthcare firm by using CEO killer's words.

[Bpeterson]

I'm actually pretty sure that you are wrong when it comes to the clear and present danger test. That test was actually made very similar to the brandenburg test but was no longer used for a long time because new laws found the clear and present danger test null and void. The Brandenburg test actually reinstated the test but this time just called the brandenburg test

[FirstLast-numba]

i love this case (hate the kkk) but i love this case because it was the reason the cops who arrested me lost their qualified immunity and i got that settlement.

[monicavelazquez]

my question is. would this have had the same effect if a memeber of a non white group had done the "statement" most probably NOT. America the great ( for some more than others of course)

[ValidatingUsername]

Most countries have to sort out how to regulate transmission of speech sent to the united states for storage or public or private dissemination from the united states 😂

[gabrielperez]

2021 2nd impeachment hearing of the 45th President of the United States brought me here after the attempted coup of the US Capitol incited by that very same president.