Mastering filterWhen with Multiple Conditions in Reactive Java

Learn how to effectively use `filterWhen` with multiple conditions in Reactor's Mono and Flux. Enhance your reactive programming skills in Spring WebFlux with practical examples!
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Filter multiple condition - reactor Flux/Mono filterWhen()

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Mastering filterWhen with Multiple Conditions in Reactive Java

Reactive programming has revolutionized the way we handle asynchronous data streams in Java, especially with Project Reactor and Spring WebFlux. One of the common challenges developers face is effectively filtering data based on multiple conditions using the filterWhen method of Mono and Flux. In this guide, we will address a specific scenario involving multiple conditions and provide a clear solution.

The Problem

You may find yourself needing to evaluate multiple conditions before allowing a data item to pass through a reactive stream. For instance, when using filterWhen, can you effectively combine conditions and understand the flow of execution? The question arises:

What happens when conditionA and conditionB are evaluated?

How can I implement multiple conditions properly?

Consider the following code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This raises the question of how to utilize the response of two asynchronous boolean conditions (conditionA and conditionB) efficiently.

Understanding filterWhen

The filterWhen method allows you to filter elements in a reactive stream based on a predicate that returns a Mono<Boolean>. However, when dealing with multiple conditions, you need to ensure you’re implementing them correctly.

The Challenge with && and ||

Using simple logical conjunction (&&) and disjunction (||) does not immediately yield the desired behavior due to the nature of asynchronous calls. The fundamental issue is understanding that:

Using && (AND): If conditionA returns false, it won't wait for conditionB to evaluate. However, the entire logic still should be handled with careful merging of results.

Using || (OR): If conditionA returns true, there is no need to wait for conditionB.

The Solution

To properly combine conditions, you can leverage the Flux class, specifically with the operators Flux# all and Flux# any, which are tailored to handle multiple reactive conditions.

Merging Conditions with Flux

Using Flux# all: This operator allows the evaluation of all conditions, emitting true only if all conditions evaluate to true. If any condition is false, it will immediately emit false.

Here's how to implement that:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using Flux# any: Alternatively, if you want to proceed when at least one condition is true, you can use Flux# any:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Eager vs. Sequential Execution

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By following this guidance, you'll be well-equipped to handle complex filtering scenarios in your reactive programming endeavors. Happy coding!