Yes, Kamala Being Childless Makes Her Unfit To Be President

preview_player
Показать описание

The media says it's sexist to point out that Kamala Harris is childless. But that fact is actually very relevant, and I'll explain why.

#MattWalsh #TheMattWalshShow #News #Politics #DailyWire #WhatIsAWoman
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

There are so many other reasons why she would be terrible. This argument is just stupid.

megganprieto
Автор

This is a foolish and weak point. There is plenty to focus on with Harris in regards to her abilities and policies.

ronlecain
Автор

I am so relieved to see everyone in the comments, regardless of political persuasion, that whether or not someone has kids is completely irrelevant and will not sink to the level Matt is trying to bait them into. Faith in humanity restored. Plenty to criticise about her - why the hell choose that.

EKL-quih
Автор

Being childless doesn't concern me, being brainless does !

underdarock
Автор

I like most of what you have to say Matt, but Kamala having no children isn’t the reason that she’s horrible. George Washington didn’t have children either.

RabidLeech
Автор

I hate how the DW talks about women without children. News flash, infertility is a thing and maybe a lot of women are childless not by choice.

alliWLC
Автор

I’m a conservative. I’m playing devils advocate. Would it be better if Kamala had a kid out of wedlock and abandoned her child? I am trying to understand your reasoning. I sincerely believe that people who have children a lot of them are trying to do a good job, but unfortunately that doesn’t mean that they actually are. And yes, I believe in human procreation, but maybe there should be a screening process first because there’s a lot of people who who have kids who clearly should not be having kids and that’s self evident

Fischl
Автор

I'm not a Kamala fan but you are assuming that those who do not have children cannot possibly empathize with those that do. It is entirely possible to love children you did not give birth to and want the best kind of country for them.

priyarachel
Автор

Eh, this is a pretty far reach. They are way more things to criticize political figures for..

SpookyKittyKat
Автор

I like Matt Walsh, but he and most of the commentators on the Daily Wire have a REALLY strange thing of always going after unmarried and childless people. These commentators are really fortunate to have the time and means to support large families in this economy. Oftentimes I feel like they forget that not all of us are lucky enough to meet the love of our life before age 40. But if anyone makes that argument, they'll claim it's our fault.

samantharuiz
Автор

Of all things that could be said about Harris, not having kids is not the problem. She is still a danger to the country

KathiLewis
Автор

Of all the reasons she’s unfit to be president, this seems like the most irrelevant one

hisnaybi
Автор

Being childless doesn't mean you don't care about the futures of other peoples children. I swear, when it comes to marriage and parenthood, all the DailyWire hosts have this insufferable pomposity about them. Congratulations, Matt. You met a woman, fell in love, married her, and had 6 kids. Not everyone has to follow the same path you did.

FJCheli
Автор

Gezus. There is plenty to criticize. Not sure one needs to point out having no kids makes Kamala unfit. If you are a career woman, having kids may not be the best thing. I reported to a female President to a large auto company for 10 years. She had two kids whom a nanny was raising because she was always travelling for work or at the office from early AM to bedtime. If you decide to have kids, it is probably good to be a big part of raising them. That means being present most days.

meattooth
Автор

Matt, I remember when you proudly announced that you would not be taking time off from work to help care for your wife after she gave birth to your second set of twins, yet here you are criticizing someone for prioritizing their career? At least she didn’t prioritize her career at the expense of her family, which is more than you can say.

SoniaElena
Автор

What about Lindsay Graham and Tim Scott? Are they worthless also because they are unmarried and have no children?

philipjon
Автор

Really Matt? Really? That is such an ignorant POV and I’m the farthest from a Democrat. I love Trump and hope he wins in November but to say her being childfree is a bad trait to lead a country is really immature and ignorant. Once again Matt pushing his pro child argument and this time into politics is low blow and screams Democratic talking points. Pretty pathetic point from Matt.

paulac
Автор

This is a disgusting way to attack a woman, what if she can’t have children due to being infertile or having a medical condition that makes it difficult to get pregnant? I’m not a fan of Karma Harris but as a young conservative married woman who has struggled with infertility and pregnancy loss some of us physically can not have children and it’s a painful reminder that society views us as less than due to something we can’t control.

allisonwelton
Автор

There are plenty of reasons why Kamala would be a terrible President, primarily her record prior to becoming the VP and especially what she hasn't done as VP. Someone not having kids is such a horrible metric to consider whether or not someone could be a leader.

tcgtpl
Автор

I often agree with Matt on a lot of things. But, someone making a conscious decision not to have children doesn't make them a less valuable human being. Some people obviously have fertility issues. But some people on the other hand simple just don't want children. There's plenty of Conservatives who are childless. Some even are childless and unmarried. No one in my personal opinion should be judged solely off the premises of them not having children. Having children doesn't automatically make you an amazing parent/individual just like being childless doesn't make you unfit/unqualified for anything. And this is coming from someone who isn't even a big fan of Kamala Harris. But, I don't get Matt's blatant distain for childless people. It's like he and the rest of his constituents attack, degrade, and ridicule childless people all day everyday. Which actually makes them look like ragging selfish narcissists themselves. Because Matt sits up here and claims that people are ''selfish'' and ''self-centered'' for not having children, but is literally being a whining selfish brat acting a fool simply because other people are not following in his footsteps of becoming a parent like he did. Newsflash Matt, not everyone is going to have the luxury of being married, or having children. People currently can't afford children, and the dating pool now has pee in it.

kamrynherring
welcome to shbcf.ru