The History of the Trust | Equity & Trusts

Where a person wished to give property to persons who were unable to hold property in their own name - such as women and children - they would give the property to a man for the use of the women and children; or where they wished someone to perform and receive the feudal duties. Another example was where the recipient had taken a vow of poverty and could own no property.

If you have any questions drop me a message below 👍🏻

-------------------------------

Hey! If you’re new to the channel… my name is Gareth Evans

I am the owner of Digestible Notes, a website created to make learning fun and easy to understand. Our ultimate goal is to make education accessible to everyone and centralise the internet's vast sea of information.

I want to show you that anyone can achieve their learning goals and live their dream life.

-------------------------------

SEE MY VIDEO ON CONSCIONABILITY AND EQUITABLE MAXIMS ➡️

[younglondonmedia]

great info! Especially the Evershed quote, hadn't been aware of that!

[paladin]

Excellent information - why not touch on beneficiaries being construed at law to be 'mortgagors' or 'debtors'? Then explain the actions one ought to undertake in Chancery, in equity - for restitution upon repayments and property that may have been repossessed by the agents to the trustees? If you can comprehend the aforementioned, you will be in a very special club.

[stevenmeek]

Can you touch on Jurastiction. Thanks.

[ArtofRobinMitchell]

the first trust is in genesis... when god left the creation in trust/dominion with men for the benefit of the future generations when they come to the age of maturity and thus become the new trustees of creation...

[atuckertucker]

It is funny that my parents and grandparents didn’t have to worry about this crap. A thief is a thief it doesn’t matter if you can twist everything to justify to yourself that it is ok.
I’m thinking the people obviously deserve what has happened..
it is written!! So I’m not surprised not one bit.