Proofs with NO PREMISES(!) ⟨08,06⟩

preview_player
Показать описание
Assumptions allow us to construct proofs with no premises. And if you can prove something without any premises, it's a logical truth.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Hey Bo, great example. I'm struggling in my own logic class and I was hoping you could help me. I'm being asked to prove (A ∨ ¬B) → (A → B). I've tried working backward, forward, sideways, proof by contradiction, etc. I just keep getting stuck with information that isn't particularly useful. I'm not even sure how to think about the problem. Maybe it's a lack of imagination on my part. Save me O-Bo Wan, you're my only hope! (sorry that was cringe, lol)

arth
Автор

These are proofs with no premises, but how about proofs with no assumptions?

philosophyversuslogic