UPDATE #4: 'I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage' - HIS ANSWERS + NEW IMAGES

preview_player
Показать описание

-Part 2: "UPDATE: I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage (New Footage)"

-Livestream Answering and Collecting Questions for Source:
LIVE - SUBMIT QUESTIONS: "I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage"

-Part 3: "UPDATE #2: "I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage" - 1967 'Flying Cross' UAP Photo Match!"

-Part 4: "UPDATE #3: "I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage" - HIS ANSWERS + NEW IMAGES

-Part 5: "UPDATE #3: "I Received a Creepy E-mail w/ Leaked UFO Footage" - FINAL ANSWERS + NEW IMAGES
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

A whistle blower sending "sensitive" information using a Gmail account is the wildest part of this whole thing.

jasonjodie
Автор

Just a heads up, skunk works is a division within Lockheed Martin. I know they're right down the street from me :-)

Baliken
Автор

We need rainbolt to pinpoint the location of the last image is located in the mountains.

RandyH
Автор

Let me get this straight.

A supposed whistleblower is risking his life and the lives of his family (this is how the legacy program keeps its secrecy) to leak images to some rando YouTuber that is a total amateur and total nobody in the UAP field?

Ya, ok. 🤦🏻‍♂️

toronto_peter
Автор

Why would he send you images that are of national security threat level, with the hopes you would not show them. Seems like a lot of ask of a random person. Trusting the nations security in the hands of a young youtuber seems far fetched.

gody
Автор

The smiley faces make it seem like they're playing a game, and not taking this with the utmost seriousness which this topic deserves. Sets off alarms in my head, personally.

dirtypure
Автор

do you recive a bunch of ufo files and your first idea is to make a patreon and get people to pay you for them. immediate discredit.

CGMushrom
Автор

The fact that the authorities haven't already been to your door asking about this and you have taken multiple cuts to ask for people to come purchase stuff lets me know what's up

ODN.
Автор

So the WB isn't really giving any more information than one of us could find without too much trouble. In my most humble opinion, I believe you may be just entertaining the thoughts of a lonely UFO/UAP enthusiast.

cornfusedatbest
Автор

Aggressive cruciform entities in hot pursuit of flying orbs right in our skies -- this is just so wild . . .

Han-uztl
Автор

Is it just me or do all these apparent photos just look like renders?

Caskey
Автор

Reposting this for visibility because this seems really sketchy to me. Aside from the PS2 appearance of the orb the shadows seem completely off to me.

14:38 The light source on the orb versus the shadows in the background make no sense. This is a LARP.

dirtypure
Автор

I think Nathan is the "leaker"

TheRealVenom
Автор

If all these images are real, the last one, the orb, is a honeypot.
if this person in specific didn't considerate the existence of honeypot images to identify who they are, he is screwed

WntedGaming
Автор

I don't know. I hope the images are real....but the 3 new ones look like something made in 3D Max Studio.
However....I do understand that real UFO's do not have rivets and seams like regular aircraft do. They are seamless.
Which gives them a sort of "rendered" look to them. But I have seem some UFOs where there are more structures to it, they have lights, they have "portholes"...etc...
But again....#1 and #3 (of the new images) look like they were made in 3D Max.

SirPaulMuaddib
Автор

These are renders. Not even a decent attempt lol

jemszjemsz
Автор

Not really taking these as much, but I do find it interesting that there’s at least two separate classes interacting with each other. Makes me feel much better about the likelihood of issues. They don’t like each other but they all like humans. Hopefully if one got mad at us the other would protect us.

aaronlegend
Автор

I am skeptical because if the classified images were not acquired legally the person who received them confidentially could publish them without prosecution. The person who acquired the images illegally would be liable only. So it would make little sense to deny an artist rendering of the blurred images at this point .

kingdave
Автор

"beyond TRL-9"

Based on the definition given for TRL-1 through 9, being beyond TRL-9 doesn't even make sense.

The definition given was that of the readiness of the tech for consumer or operation use. So it being "beyond" ready for operational use makes zero sense at all...

The intention was clearly to say it was (as stated) centuries AHEAD of our current tech.. but yeah, that just didn't make any sense.

Good try, again. Major grift

mupetmower
Автор

Not gonna lie brother. You fumbling on so many words was kind of distracting and takes away from the content.

Kent-tdwb