More About the AIM-174B

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

“Did you consider watching Spongebob”?.. 😂 😂😂

pieterjlansbergen
Автор

Literally from a purely statistical analysis I can find no fault with the results as presented. We would need restricted/classified data to make a more refined estimate and that won't be happening.

brasidas
Автор

Was a great vid. Getting a ball park figure using your methodology is vastly better than the flag waving detractors. Getting their data from SpongeBob 😂

silentone
Автор

How to win argument

“Did you consider watching SpongeBob ?”

Sit back and enjoy the victory

avus-kwf
Автор

Everything I know about quantum based metal alloys used in thrust vectoring vortex generators, I learned from watching SpongeBob.

falconeaterf
Автор

outside of warthunder forums your not going to get much better information. It is also worth realising that the SM-6 is exo-atmospheric capable from sea level. the missile performance indicates the estimated maximum range of 600KM is reasonable.

alexandermarken
Автор

Guys, don't forget about the effective range of the missile to hit a plane like su-34, su-30 etc., because it will be way more less then the maximum range.

NANI-msws
Автор

The suggested weight could imply a couple different things: either it has a very significant range increase, a much larger and more sophisticated guidance package, or a combination of the two

andrewreynolds
Автор

This calls for us to request Gaijin for lea.. i mean further clarifications that are completely legal

gamingrex
Автор

Actually, the method you used is valid. Often, performance predictions for new weapon systems are extrapolated from similar systems. The remaining unknowns are modeled. The results are surprisingly accurate.

divegorilla
Автор

Guesstimate.
It’s a valid thing with limited information and surprisingly useful.

brucebaxter
Автор

For a rough calculation, compare the kinetic and potential energy the booster would give the missile from 0 vs the potential and kinetic energy while mach 1 on 40k feet. If the weight of missile is known, just have to find out more about the booster

cem
Автор

Your methodology was fine. Unless the missile uses some exotic fuel with an unusually high energy density, you’ll be in the right ballpark. Estimating is … well, estimating based on available data.

yan
Автор

I think we can assume, that the estimated range of the 174 is comparable to the sea based sm6. The air launched has no booster, but can launched from high altitude with high initial speed. That allows from my perspective to attack enemy AWACS, what is closing a critical gap…

m.andrews
Автор

Lmao my brother, you made my day again!

nerdwwii
Автор

Excellent response. As most adults are well aware, there is no point wasting time and energy on a more detailed calculation, where the result—employing approximate values—will be pretty much the same. These clowns need to get out of their basements and breathe some fresh air😂!

michaelguerin
Автор

I'd like to see the 174 envelope compared to the Phoenix.

Provocateur
Автор

One minute silence for victims of plastine 🙏🙏

Muhammadhamza-xvsw
Автор

Algorithm-kicker ! Everybody have a lovely day!

martinabowm
Автор

I love this channel and I love SpongeBob. Why can’t we all be friends?

charleshopkins