Michael Malice Explains Why He's An Anarchist

preview_player
Показать описание

Michael Malice explains his political viewpoint of anarchism. Why is he an anarchist? What is anarchy? How similar is Antifa to Michael's view of anarchism? Is violence necessary? Is it a realistic way to run a government? Does Malice believe in the police?

From Modern Wisdom Podcast #277 | Michael Malice - Connecting The Dots Of Chaos.

#michaelmalice #anarchism #politics

-

Listen to all episodes online. Search "Modern Wisdom" on any Podcast App or click here:

-

Get in touch in the comments below or head to...
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Anarchy clicked for me when I realized that any relationship where consent isn't respected is a breeding ground for abuse.

pod
Автор

Anarchists believe in not detangling your earphones cord.

gn
Автор

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do”
-Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

colleenemmerson
Автор

@4:03 "We tend to be peaceful for the simple reason--not because people are basically good, but because violence is expensive."

noyb
Автор

“ *The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater* .”

- Frank Zappa

insertnamehere
Автор

Glad he called it by its name: Corporatism. At this point the corporations own the state

bolo
Автор

Loved this one. You did a great job getting him to elaborate and explain his positions, your questions are always on point

nick_ashley
Автор

"I'm gonna listen to the Cure, write in my diary with fingerless gloves..."

Cannot. Stop. Chuckling.

doc
Автор

I watched the full interview the other day but seeing this clip pop up brought me back, hungry for more! Keep up the great work. Really been enjoying your interview.

dylanl
Автор

I’m realizing I might be going the anarchist route myself

themadmattster
Автор

There are no words for how much I love Michael Malice ❤️

theQiwiMan
Автор

I can not stand government, rules, and fetters. I can't stand caged animals, People must be free.
As for politics, I am an Anarchist.
-Charles Chaplin

I do not wish to rule or be ruled.
I am an Anarchist.
If you are hungry I will feed you
If you are cold I will clothe you
If you are sad I will listen
If you are happy I will celebrate with you
I do not do these things under threat of fines or imprisonment
I do them simply because they are the right thing to do
I am an Anarchist
I am Free.
We are all stardust, Looking back at the stars, trying to understand itself.
-Kenneth Mabie

KenMabie
Автор

Btw, why do we fear a term our would-be victim made up for us? "Anarchy" is something the government worked very hard to stigmatize. Because without stigma, we wouldn't fear doing it to get rid of them.

fettel
Автор

Violence IS expensive. Unless youre the consistent winner. Issue with anarchism is most people pre-disposed to violence as a solution also dont worry about the future cost of it, even in the face of losing. Warlordism exists for a reason

donaldstrubler
Автор

14:45 focus on your local community, your direct sphere of influence. turn that anxiety into building up and sowing into your local life.

because in any terrible circumstances, with the State intact or not, if your local community falters then none of the macro stuff matters much anyways.

therunawayrascal
Автор

Make your mark on the world and find your been lied to your whole life by the state. At 56 it’s never too late to take in Michaels message; great interview. Thanks 👍👍

jacklonergan
Автор

Marshall Rosenberg's NVC is a great compliment to the anarchist perspective and it's good for overcoming your reliance on the state.

BitterTast
Автор

The problem is his analogies is they always predict an ideal social reaction to issues like the bartender kicking you out, he assumes people will just leave voluntarily, and two people fighting, he assumes people will break it up.

fleebojenkins
Автор

I would drop the bar fight example. Nobody jumps in to break one up. Free entertainment!

jeffcrist
Автор

We don't have to funnel every decision through DC - Let individuals or localites work out what's best for them

jdt