Valid and Invalid Arguments in Logic using truth tables part 1

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

awesome explanation! I have been lost for three days trying to understanding the truth table. These videos gave me a clear idea of validating deductive arguments using the Truth table.

AlexanderyFlomo
Автор

theruna ayye. hodata explain karala dunna. jaya wewa.

nimmanaamarasinghe
Автор

Your explaination is simple and easy to understand

narayanmorajkar
Автор

Dito po ako nakakuha ng examples ng valid salamat po

sjsjsjsjs
Автор

Very very confusing how about using Antecedent and consequent and Talking about Modus tollens denying the consequent

kojocoverfhoto
Автор

Can you please solve for me this argument ???

danidannyabrahimernestsesa
Автор

What is elementary valid argument form? Prove the validity of the following? (a) p>q therefore q (b) therefore p>r (c) P.... therefore P v q.

Plis help🙏

gaishinlung
Автор

Difine the invalid and valid argument ?

danieldereje
Автор

A. Unseen question
B. Reduce the passage below to the simplest symbolic logic

Premise 1: The girls who have reached puberty will be taken into the bondo bush or they will be stocked by an enactment of parliament.

Premise 2: The girls have attained the prescribe stage and the parliamentary enactment will not stop them.

Conclusion: No conclusion give

Please i am in need of argument solution please help

danidannyabrahimernestsesa