How many squares are in different sizes of grids? #shorts

preview_player
Показать описание
#shorts #short #math #mathematics #squares #grid #square #puzzle #formula #pattern

Combo Class is a crazy educational show where you can have fun learning rare things about math, science, language, and more! This is the SHORTS channel for faster-paced videos. Make sure you're also subscribed to the main Combo Class channel where full episodes go!

DISCLAIMER: any use of fire, tools, or other science experiments in this series is always done in a safe and professional way. Do not try to copy any actions you see in this series yourself.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Check out this longer new video I made with this topic expanded to more shapes like rectangles and triangles:

Domotro
Автор

him: how many squares are in this picture.
me: four
him: you might be able to count there's five
me : ...

neelsharma
Автор

Learning math from a guy crouched under a tree

inferno
Автор

Math rule 101:
Never try to come up with the solution
Come up with a formula

bappibhai
Автор

Me walking in the woods when a man comes out of a bush and says "how many squares are in this picture"

nanakiblox
Автор

"Honey jack harlow is in our backyard teaching the kids math again"

victorokah
Автор

I actually discovered (might be a big word but It was the first time for me) this formula some 2 years back when I had a question on an exam on how many squares are in a chessboard, I found this same type of recursion and left feeling like an absolute champ.

kimtgf
Автор

Bro looks like Hans Niemann an Jack Harlow combined

georgiolegaci
Автор

"Sir, what are you doing on my backyard"

JoshZnh
Автор

Number of parellolograms in a parallelogram formula:

Rows addition × column addition

Since square is a type of parallelogram and rectangle too (they satisfy property of parallelogram: opposite side being parallel)

Number of rectangles in the last 6×6 square is:

(1+2+3+4+5+6)×(1+2+3+4+5+6)= 21×21=441 rectangles

A topic of permutations and combination.

9th grade in Kota, education capital of
India 🇮🇳 as many students come to Kota to prepare for exams like iit jee, neet.

alankritbansal
Автор

Him: (calling over kids that are alone under a tree) Hey kid want free math advice

xrekshot
Автор

Do I counted and there seems to be 91:
36 - 1*1
25 - 2*2
16 - 3*3
9 - 4*4
2 - 5*5
1 - 6*6

arienmartinez
Автор

I think there was a 3b1b video on the rectangle problem? The trick is to start thinking in terms of 'choosing' 2 out of n lines to be one set of the rectangle's sides, and then choosing another 2 the same way using combinatorics.

nicholasboffa
Автор

You actually manage to make something boring like this super fun. Your presentation is flawless. As a scientist, I can feel just how much fun you are having while presenting. I loved your video on 1/0 too

TutorJeff
Автор

Feels soo good when you get it right!! :D
Its 91!

sanju.meshram
Автор

Jack Harlow using his brain for 3 seconds :

Lalo-Salamanca.
Автор

I love the way he said "Square Numbers" 😂

FizzyK-
Автор

I figured this out on my own, and was like: "wait... Am i smart?" But then I tried to eat a coin instead of a tosti.

boazburger
Автор

I think the Formula is
Total length of the biggest square -> n
n² + (n-1)² + (n-1-1)² ... and goes on until the n reaches "1"

Correct me if im wrong

AndraRill
Автор

Challenge accepted!

Black Pen Red Pen actually talked about this problem before (the rectangle one) so my solution would be very similar

Each rectangle has a length and a width. Let's separate them and try choosing the length first

I'll go for a concrete example but I'll also build a general case

Say I have 6 rows of squares in the grid, and I have to choose which rows to include in my rectangle. There's 6 ways to pick 1 row, 5 ways to pick 2 (because you can't have gaps), 4 ways to pick 3, and so on. That's 6+5+4+3+2+1 which is the 6th triangular number which is 21.

And in general if you have M rows in the grid, the total number of ways to pick the rows is the Mth triangular number or M(M+1)/2.

Now there's nothing special about me using rows. I can play the same argument but with 6 columns (N columns). Better, whatever I chose for M does not restrict me in what I can choose for N. I can even have a different number of columns than rows in the starting GRID and the argument still makes sense.

So the total number of rectangles in a 6x6 grid is 6(7)/2 * 6(7)/2 = 441. In a 6x7 grid it's 6(7)/2 * 7(8)/2 = 588. And in an MxN grid it's M(M+1)/2 * N(N+1)/2.

Again, there's nothing special with using 2 dimensions for this argument, so the number of rectangular prisms is just M(M+1)/2 * N(N+1)/2 * O(O+1)/2. And in D dimensions, it's the product of M(M+1)/2, where M is the number of squares in the row/column/whatever orthogonal direction for all orthogonal directions that make up D.

The square argument YOU showed also generalizes to squares in a rectangle and cubes in a rectangular prism

For an MxN grid (4x6 as an example, WLOG I will assume M is less than or equal to N), the largest square you can make is MxM (4x4).

The number of 1x1 squares is MxN (4x6), the number of 2x2 squares is (M-1)(N-1) (3x5), and so on until you get to the number of MxM squares which is (1)(N-M+1) or just N-M+1 (1x3). The total is the sum of all of that, in our 4x6 example it's 4x6 + 3x5 + 2x4 + 1x3 = 50.

And in higher dimensions we can play the same game with cubes or hypercubes in rectangular prism grids. Just decrease every dimension by 1 until one of the dimensions hits 1, then multiply and add.

In a 4x5x6 rectangular prism there are 4x5x6 + 3x4x5 + 2x3x4 + 1x2x3 = 210 cubes inside.

nanamacapagal