Checkmate!♟️A SU-75 Production: Idea from @Jet_editss #sukhoi #su57 #su75 #aviation

[AviationIsCool]

Hello everyone! I would just like to specify I am NOT comparing the Su-57 or Su-75 to Western-Made Fighters, Or Saying that I like the Jet. I hope that you can understand that this video has intended to spark public interest in one of Russias newest fighters! I also do not condone the actions of Russia in any way, shape or form and their actions against the innocent people of Ukraine who have been brought into a conflict they didn’t want in the first place. Thank you for your time and support to my channel! 😊

[LeeDickerson-mvwt]

Russia after figuring out their new jet got leaked:😡

[demben]

10 bucks says its going to be another overhyped jet that will be produced in small numbers then get attacked by suicide drones

[Imkacperhi]

the SU-75 Checkmate is fucking hard nickname

[SheepDog]

The Su-75 Checkmate is an ambitious project from Russia that aims to be a cost-effective, lightweight fifth-generation fighter. However, the F-22 still holds several advantages over this upcoming platform, even with the Su-75 promising some modern features. Here are the key reasons the F-22 is likely to remain superior in several areas:

1. Stealth

• F-22: As one of the first true stealth fighters, the F-22’s design is optimized for minimizing its radar cross-section. It has an extremely low RCS, thanks to its shape, internal weapons bays, and use of radar-absorbing materials.
• Su-75: The Checkmate is designed with stealth in mind, but it is not yet clear if its stealth capabilities will match the F-22’s level. While it aims to be low-cost, this could mean compromises in the radar-absorbing materials or overall stealth effectiveness.

2. Proven Combat Readiness

• F-22: The F-22 has been operational for nearly two decades, with significant real-world combat and patrol experience. It has been tested under various scenarios, proving its reliability in active duty.
• Su-75: The Su-75 is still in development, with no operational track record. While it is designed to be a cost-effective export aircraft, its combat readiness and reliability are still unproven. The gap between prototype and full operational capability is significant.

3. Sensor Fusion and Avionics

• F-22: The F-22’s sensor fusion is top-tier, allowing the pilot to receive and interpret data from various sources, including its radar, infrared, and electronic warfare systems. It integrates these inputs into a single, cohesive picture, giving the pilot superior situational awareness.
• Su-75: While the Su-75 is expected to have modern avionics and sensor fusion, it is unlikely to match the F-22’s mature, battle-tested systems. Russia has made advances in avionics, but U.S. technology in this field remains ahead.

4. Stealth Fighter vs. Light Fighter Role

• F-22: The F-22 is a full-fledged air superiority fighter with an emphasis on gaining and maintaining control of the air. It is designed to dominate in high-intensity, high-threat environments, often without needing support from other aircraft.
• Su-75: The Su-75 is a lighter, more cost-effective multi-role fighter. While it aims to have some air superiority capabilities, it’s primarily being positioned for export markets and lower-budget air forces. It may not have the same capability to operate in contested airspace as the F-22, which was built for high-end, full-spectrum warfare.

5. Thrust-to-Weight Ratio and Maneuverability

• F-22: The F-22 boasts a very high thrust-to-weight ratio, along with thrust-vectoring nozzles, which enable it to be incredibly agile and maneuverable. This makes it not only hard to detect but also hard to target in close combat.
• Su-75: The Su-75 may offer some thrust-vectoring and advanced maneuverability, but being a smaller, lighter fighter, it will not likely match the raw performance of the F-22. While it will be nimble, it won’t have the same combination of speed, range, and agility.

6. Weapons Load and Internal Weapon Bays

• F-22: The F-22 can carry a substantial amount of air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons in its internal bays, maintaining its stealth profile. It is equipped with AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles and AIM-9 Sidewinders for air combat and has provisions for precision-guided bombs.
• Su-75: The Su-75 is expected to carry a smaller payload internally, as it is a lighter platform. It will have to make some trade-offs in its weapons load capacity to maintain stealth, and its overall payload will likely be less than the F-22’s.

7. Electronic Warfare and Countermeasures

• F-22: The F-22 is equipped with some of the most advanced electronic warfare systems available, including the ability to jam enemy radars and communications. Its defensive countermeasures are highly sophisticated, allowing it to evade incoming threats with ease.
• Su-75: While the Su-75 will likely feature modern electronic warfare systems, it’s unlikely to match the F-22’s proven capabilities. Russian systems have been improving, but they are often designed with export markets in mind, which may prioritize cost over the highest level of sophistication.

8. Development Philosophy: High-End vs. Cost-Effective

• F-22: The F-22 was designed with no expense spared in terms of its performance and technological superiority. It represents the cutting edge of what’s possible in a fighter jet, with cost being a secondary consideration.
• Su-75: The Su-75, on the other hand, is explicitly designed to be affordable, aimed at countries that need a capable fighter without the budget for something like the F-35 or F-22. This cost-effective approach inherently means compromises in materials, avionics, and systems integration.

9. Operational Support and Logistics

• F-22: The F-22 benefits from extensive logistical support and an established supply chain, especially within the U.S. Air Force. Its maintenance, while expensive, is well-practiced, with a solid infrastructure in place.
• Su-75: As a new, unproven platform, the Su-75 will need time to establish its own logistical support network. This is especially challenging for export markets, where maintenance and parts could become an issue in the early years of deployment.

10. Strategic Role

• F-22: The F-22 is designed for high-end combat operations in heavily contested environments, taking on the most sophisticated threats. It can operate independently or in concert with other advanced aircraft, such as the F-35, to dominate airspace.
• Su-75: The Su-75 is geared more toward mid-tier threats and export markets. While it may be effective against less capable adversaries, it is not designed to take on the most sophisticated air defense systems or to engage in high-threat environments as effectively as the F-22.

11. International Integration

• F-22: Though the F-22 is not available for export, its systems and tactics are well-integrated into NATO and allied operations. It benefits from shared data, communication networks, and operational synergies with other U.S. and allied platforms.
• Su-75: The Su-75 is primarily aimed at countries outside the U.S. alliance structure, which limits its integration into broader multi-national defense operations. While it may perform well for individual countries, it lacks the broader system-wide integration of the F-22.

Conclusion

While the Su-75 Checkmate has the potential to be an affordable and capable fifth-generation fighter, especially for export markets, the F-22 remains superior in key areas such as stealth, sensor fusion, air superiority, and overall performance. The F-22 was designed with no compromises for maintaining air dominance, while the Su-75 focuses on cost-effectiveness and versatility. This makes the F-22 more suited for high-intensity conflict against sophisticated adversaries, while the Su-75 is positioned more as an economical, multi-role platform.

[BradleyBooth]

Su-75 checkmate, even the name is badass

[Jet_editss]

Yo bro Nice video! But just wondering, did you get idea from me? Exact same clips, song, text and everything

[Oscar-qhjn]

It's checkmate will it only maybe having 5 produced in the next 15 years. Clean looking regardless

[OldbonesxD]

"things probably held together with wood screws" - the kid -hlc

[Feeunasked]

They gonna build one every 100 years 💀

[Vraytniev]

Russia's first single engine jet in decades

[ChrisHansen.x]

When France has had a better faster smaller stealth fighter for 20 plus years "Laughs in Rafale"

[turkdipper]

So stealth that even russians cant see it

[SkeletonRD]

The 75 stands for how much years it took to make

[Cherubium]

The 22 sitting behind it at all times:💀

[CANDYKID]

The drafts are going to be crazy for the next few years

[Itsukikun-bx]

Also you'll have to see USA new 6gen Fighter.

[SheepDog]

The 22 would just be sitting behind it and pop off a couple AIM 9s because Russian radars suck.

[tstaccount]

Ohhh I get it, the 75 stands for its RCS in meters

[wannabeeditz]

The thing is that no point of being scared about something that will never exist cuz it’s so god dam expensive that they can’t make more than ten of them