HUAWEI Pura 70 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra Comparison Review

In this video we have two Ultra flagships yet again!
It's the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, but which is truly the flagship between the two?

--Find out in this comparison review.

00:00 Intro
00:37 Design and Build
02:36 Display and Multimedia
04:01 Performance and Benchmarks
05:48 Cameras
07:53 Battery Life
08:50 Connectivity
10:07 Verdict

⬇⬇⬇

[dew]

Xiaomi 14U for me. I've a global redmi note 13 pro 5g and I'm liking it so far. And I don't think I saw any ads on the global version redmi so far.

[clever]

Xiaomi made an impressive increase in performance. If it was for 1000€ I would go from the mate 50 pro to the pura 70 ultra, but for this crazy 1500€ price I hesitate to go to Xiaomi or to wait the end of the year. Mate 50 pro is really an excellent phone, only I'd like to have this speed for taking photography announced for the 70 ultra.

[donoella]

Love both brands and phones. Just ordered the 14 Ultra

[hffbmfu]

Huawei pura 70 ultra vs vivo x100 ultra camera comarison....

[NatsuDragkneel]

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra, with its top-tier hardware, might seem like a tech enthusiast's dream come true. But the reality is a nightmare. A measly 2 years of major software upgrades and another 2 years of minor updates for a device that costs an arm and a leg? It's a slap in the face to every consumer who has ever trusted Huawei with their hard-earned money. It's like buying a Ferrari only to find out it comes with tires that will wear out in two years and no replacements available. It's not just disappointing, it's downright insulting!

Then there's the Xiaomi Mi 14 Ultra. Sure, it offers 4 years of major OS updates, which sounds great until you realize that you've basically signed up to be a walking billboard. The constant barrage of ads is intrusive and annoying. It's like inviting a door-to-door salesman into your home, only to have him refuse to leave. You're not just a customer to Xiaomi, you're a product being sold to the highest bidder. It's a gross violation of trust and privacy.

In essence, it's a choice between a shiny, expensive paperweight that becomes obsolete in a couple of years, and a device that treats you like a commodity rather than a valued customer. It's a lose-lose situation, and frankly, consumers deserve better. It's high time these companies started respecting their customers and offering products and services that are worth our time and money. Until then, it's just a bitter pill that we, as consumers, are forced to swallow.

[UnrealOne]

Stop bringing DXO, please. They had magic 6 pro in top for 2 months, and no other review for 2 months after to boost its sales. And lets be real, the Magic 6 pro is WAY bellow Xiaomi 14 ultra, Vivo 100 Pro And Oppo x7 Ultra. But I guess only Honor paid them. Its mind blowing that they say Magic 6 pro gives great quality on all zoon levels when it desintegrates compared with vivo, xiaomi, huawei and oppo. So please, fuck dxo mark. Literally every youtuber out there ranked the magic 6 pro bellow these phones except DXO mark. Also NO PHOTO COMPARISON with other phones in the magic 6 pro review...wonder

[sense]

Which one is better for concert fancam? Pura 70 ultra, S24 ultra or Xiaomi 14 ultra?

[youtubewatcher]

pls also do a comparo of pura 70 pro with other similarly priced smartphones

[ailnoza]

Hello, may review na po ba kayo ng Xiaomi pad 6? if wala po, pwede pong pa-review? Thank You!

[sludgesnerve]

huawei is the best but just overpriced

[kpehe]

I don't think I like these two brands. I prefer Vivo and Oppo. 2:11

[bangjoe]

I hope Xiaomi 15 Ultra has features like LivePhoto on iPhone, diverse Bokeh like Vivo, 2.8K up to 60fps UltraSteady mode on all rear cameras, 4K120fps on all rear cameras, 8K up to 60fps on all rear cameras, 10-bit LOG up to 4K120fps, switch cameras when recording video at 4K60fps resolution (on all cameras including the front camera), 10-bit Dolby Vision up to 4K120fps on all rear cameras (up to 4K60fps in front facing camera) and comes with the following specs....

BODY
Build Glass front (Dragon Crystal Glass), Glass back (Dragon Crystal Glass) or Eco Leather back, Titanium frame
SIM Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) or Dual SIM (1x Nano-SIM and 1x eSIM, dual stand-by)
IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
DISPLAY
Type LTPO3 AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 6000 nits (peak)
Size 6.8 inches, (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels
Protection Dragon Crystal Glass
PLATFORM
OS Android 15, HyperOS 2.0
Chipset Qualcomm SM8750 Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 (3 nm)
MEMORY
Card slot No
Internal 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
UFS 4.1
MAIN CAMERA
Triple 50 MP, f/1.6-4.0, 35mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS
200 MP, f/1.8, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", Dual Pixel PDAF (5cm - ∞), OIS, 3.5x optical zoom
50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/1.55", Dual Pixel PDAF
TOF 3D, (depth)
Features Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, UltraHDR, panorama, Eye AF
SELFIE CAMERA
Single 32 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS
Features UltraHDR, panorama, Eye AF
SOUND
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers
3.5mm jack No
32-bit/384kHz audio
COMMS
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Bluetooth 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC
Positioning GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
NFC Yes
Infrared port Yes
Radio No
USB USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2x2, DisplayPort 1.4, OTG
FEATURES
Sensors Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum, barometer
Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM
Browser HTML5
Virtual proximity sensing
Ultra Wideband 2 (UWB) support
Satellite Calling and Message
BATTERY
Type Si/C 5600 mAh, non-removable
Charging 90W wired
80W wireless
10W reverse wireless

[bryancastro]

Huawei overpriced with a chip comparable with the sd 888 in 2024.👎👎