Trump backtracks on ending Ukraine war as NATO faces ‘difficult choices ahead’ | Jamie Shea

preview_player
Показать описание
Former Nato official Jamie Shea discusses the latest Nato Military Committee meeting in Brussels.

Join this channel to get access to perks -

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

At 1:20, NATO needs to grow a spine and block the entry to the Baltic of every ship that is going to Russia!

tombrunila
Автор

As an American, I want to apologize to you all for my soon to be president

justintabatabai
Автор

pUtin - not tRump should be given the credit making NATO stronger.

JunkerOnDrums
Автор

Don't tell Trump anything that might be important to you.

karylkrug
Автор

10:17 I think the big thing that Europeans don't understand about Donald Trump is you should not view him as a politician nor a businessman. He is a Salesman first and foremost. Whether it's a grift or a legitimate product he made money by convincing people to "buy" things, and you could view this as a policy position. He can be easily manipulated to do things as long as it makes him look like the benefactor of "The Deal".

JohnHolmes-hv
Автор

Realism is dawning on many in my Russia. I live Samara and, if you read Russia social media "VK" u will see that many in my Russia know war to be losed. Inflation is very bad now in Russia!

dpelpal
Автор

So he’s PROMISED, cheaper groceries, cheaper gas, stop a war in Ukraine, and more American jobs.
Now he has gone back on all promises after being voted in.
MAKE THE RICH, RICHER AGAIN.

dennymcdonough
Автор

Just gotta think this through.

Undermining NATO will lead to smaller mutual defence pacts replacing it e.g. between Britain and France, maybe merged armed forces and possibly nuclear proliferation in Europe.

The kind of situation we had before WWI and didn't resolve before WWII but with the added frisson of nukes.

Yes, many NATO members need to pay more. Accepted. But a pre-WWI scenario with nukes is not a place we should scoff at.
Too much chance of a WWI type European war, but with nukes....

The US ended up with no choice but to get involved in WWI. And WWII. Just saying.

robmcrob
Автор

finally someone who knows and understands! Kudos sir

chiseldrock
Автор

It is not only defence spending but also attack spending.

romansUK
Автор

We need to be a cohesive team to reinforce peace and freedom if anyone challenges that there will be consequences simple!!🇦🇺🇦🇺🕊🕊

jasonwalters
Автор

Call his bluff ... 31 other countries in NATO; 56 in the Commonwealth; 140 in the "free world." America First really means America Only - let's oblige him.

danmayberry
Автор

On yer bike Donald - Europe will manage without you

JN-omrw
Автор

This guy knows what he's Talking about and makes a lot of sense 👏

Quondare
Автор

What incentive is there is making a peace deal with an opponent that is incapable of keeping any deal (going by his track record)? Let alone a clueless idiots deal. Pushing someone into a shabby peace when you've barely given any support (in comparison to the capacity to assist) seems very poor.

milesnixon
Автор

Melania is counting down the days to cash-in on her ‘investment’.

Steven-voee
Автор

Very good young interviewer. Very impressive.

paulwilliams
Автор

NATO needs a reset to understand who its enemy is and what standing by alliances means. In particular the economic war the Europeans (and until recently Britain) have waged against Australia for generations needs to end. NATO is deaf and blind without the Australian-American component of SIGINT, so it makes no sense for the Europeans to continue the punitive trade embargo they’ve inflicted on Australia for generations any longer.

seanlander
Автор

Putin's antics made NATO wake up and think about rearmament not trump's ranting !! He's just attention seeking.

amandafooks
Автор

Europe is too expensive to keep propping up and who in human history had a more conflated view of themselves? And i say this as an american...

operator