Oldest Technologies That Scientists Still Can’t Explain!

preview_player
Показать описание
It's hard to imagine, but these structures and monuments could not have been built by humans with the technologies available today, yet they are thousands of years old! The oldest technologies, which scientists still cannot explain, leave us speechless. These mysterious constructions and technologies, which seem impossible, are real, and they have been built by our ancestors or by a previously unknown civilization with such perfection that they defy our modern explanations. These "impossible" technologies are not only fascinating archaeological discoveries but also witnesses to a time when the impossible apparently was quite real!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The real mystery here is why scientists lie about the technology past civilizations had. These magnificent carvings/structures weren’t made with a hand held ice pick and chisel. 🤥🤦🏼‍♀️

achristine
Автор

Perhaps our ancestors were a lot more knowledgable and skilful than we give them credit for.

blodwen
Автор

It has taken humans less than 500 years to get from stone and horse drawn carriages to modern technologies. Hard to belief that for thousands of years humans just hunted with spears. Must have had cycles of High technologies and a reset from cataclysmic disasters.

getgreatstuffgetgreatstu
Автор

If a man drained his rice farm to discover the cave system then maybe it is water erosion.

matthewseed
Автор

Regular man and giants lived together. The little men hired the giants to do the heavy work. And afterwards the little men got the credit for doing it. Sorta like what politicians do nowadays. 😅

calvinjohnson
Автор

Why don't you think the technology couldn't happen years ago when everyone lived ten times longer than today's life span

cleatuselder
Автор

We were educated that our civilization is advancing in time and we are living on the leading edge of it - and yet we can’t conceive or tolerate that these stone blocks were once fluid state to be left hardened in time. On the other hand, we can accept something no different from that - wet mixed sand and fine gravel pour into mold and left hardened over tube into a s concrete structure. Who is more advanced? Ancient builders or modern men?

philoso
Автор

Graham Hancock is not, nor has he ever claimed to be, an Archaeologist. (That statement indicating he is did, totally discredits the whole Narrative of this video.)

Graham Hancock is a degreed Journalist, who has the logic, clarity, confidence, and fortitude, necessary to make the statements that countless others, including other degreed Academics agree, yet he deals with countless defaming accusations. One example is:

1. The Sphinx has been dated to a conservative age of 11, 5000 BCE. This dating was performed by Robert Shoch, PhD, Geophysicist, Boston College Professor, (Yale Grad) whose findings were Peer Reviewed and Journal Published back in the 1990's.
🔹 "Mainstream Academics/Archaeologists/Egyptologst's", continue to deny and ignore these Scientific Findings as they, without Peer Review, date the Great Pyramid and the Complex to )haroh Kufu and his Son, at appx 3000 BCE and call the Great Pyramid a tomb.
(No supporting evidence exists execpt: "1 graffiti tag inside the structure with Kufu's name, spelled wrong.")
Hancock has received mass rebuttle from "Mainstream Academics", all matter of public slanderous accusations against him personally and they make a point to state he lacks the credibility to make his statements. Countless attempts to ruin his reputation, they, without any research or study, simply stand upon their "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline used as their foundation of fact" (this doesn't meet the "Standards of Science and Research" which prohibits using a Theory as Fact.) and acvuse and name call.

The behavior is a statement of their "Lower Mind, aka Ego Mind, aka Adolescent Minded" reactions.

This 1 layer of the Hancock experience represents the greater point of the subject.

As the "Mainstream Academics" cling to their "19th Century Theory based Paradigm", a belief based subject, they make the point that defeats their retorts, "The "Mainstream Academics/Archaeologists" position is "Not Supported by Science", nor do their History Stories meet any "Scientific Standard" in order to be claimed as Accurate. They accuse him 9f Psuedoscience, while they literally act out the very definition of Psuedoscience.

Journalists, true educated and degreed Journalists have a Standard, Graham has folliwed this standard, requiring a minimum of 2, 3 preferred, Resources that can be Referenced to support whatever subject they claim, in writing, on film, or in broadcast.

Graham has made a point to Publically state, "I am a Joyrnalist, not an Archaeologist", yet Graham used all available Resources, be these Archaeologists, Geologists, Anthropologist s, Historians, Anthro-Sociologists, Lab Based Science/Testing, Genetics, etc. The "Mainstream Academics/Archaeologists" often and routinely avoid using these other Experts when they fear their input won't fit or support their "19th Century Theory based Paradigm".

Genetics, in all of their studies and research and findings, are and already have in my perspective, proving ther "Paradigm" inaccurate.

The subject of vast Media Venues Productions, that is every bit as weak as the "Mainstream Paradigm", countless people producing works and airing them on the web based platforms, like YouTube, consist of about 80% + who never spent 1 day in a Journalism Classroom and most of these have no Standard other than Ego and Profits, and their works are causing as much confusion and havoc as Fox News Opinion Commentaries.

The spread of these unethical Levels of information are every bit as toxic as any posion.

Make a point to put Accuracy the 1st Requirement.

Edit this video and establish a Standard. 1 mistake, be it known or oversight, destroys the whole of the work and the Hosts reputation is no considered trustworthy.

This 8s a fact, and there will always be 1 or more whi know greater facts. It 8s a risk that requires the "2 Resources and References Standard".

Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
(I also have a degree in Journalism, University of Memphis)

"Ethics"

bethbartlett
Автор

Humans did all this for fun...they had no Wi-Fi or television😂

ismailosman
Автор

In Quraan Allah says in old age people were more advanced in power and technology that r not given after new age times

musabiber
Автор

There is a 'story' in the Bible talking about a King that decided to build a tower that went all the way to heaven. The purpose was to house all those speaking in agreement to prevent them from spreading out and scattered over the surface of the earth. The Bible shows they had one language and there was nothing they wanted to do that would be unattainable for them.. They gradually left off building the city because their language was changed to prevent them from communicating with one another, So the language of all the earth was confused. Genesis 11:1-9. These verses show the ability of the Human Kind, at that time, to do great things in regards to building work. We are no where on the same level of those in ancient times.

vivianwiseJUSTUS
Автор

I love the show but am fed up with the damn metric system and do not appreciare hearing the metric system on every show and not the American system of feet and inches ect, all i ever hear is kilometers and meters, i have a meter on my house, it measures my electric usage.
Please use both measurments if you are going to use the metric system.

DanielSimpson-qpcm
Автор

Things are so obvious!.. Education must change!.. We are not stupid or children!...

pikifrino
Автор

That's only in nonfiction books that people lived 10 times longer. Life spans have been getting longer. A 1000 years ago you were lucky to see 25yo and 40 was ancient.

matthewseed
Автор

Take a shot everytime the narrator says Elon Musk and you'll be wasted lol

MochaMoray
Автор

ice melts, water level goes DOWN. fill a glass with water, put it in the freezer .

JimHeil-sfdc
Автор

Imagine tens of thousands of men each with a chisel and hammer and a boss who is like Putin. No different they were all threatened with work or die of deprivation. Most guys would work they, re ass off. There wasn, t advanced technology, just a boss with a whip.

SteveClay-jdlc
Автор

Yes the great builders of the past, credit where it is due, but todays technology can build virtually anything.

franklinadams
Автор

The problem is we dont think in terms of shear manpower. Imagine 100, 000 people determined to create something for what they believe is God on Earth.

paulwerline
Автор

If the brick's are there where are the tools and the graves

chrisusher