Watch Deadline: White House Highlights: June 20

Показать описание

Watch the top stories from Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, airing weekdays from 4 to 6 p.m. ET on MSNBC.

Follow MSNBC Show Blogs

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.

Connect with MSNBC Online

#trump #supremecourt #msnbc

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

why is Andrew Weisman not on the Supreme Court? We need someone with his clarity and common sense making those decisions.

patriciastuart

As an attorney licensed in Florida federal district courts, I wrote a complaint to the 11th circuit only to find they stopped taking such complaints as they feel it is an “orchestrated effort”. New name for grass roots common sense and anger. Apparently, a large number of complaints means they are all invalid. Why not issue an opinion on the merits and then stop accepting them? I have actually retired because of everything since 2016. It’s funny, when i was 12 and watergate was occurring, i thought it must be complicated because no one in my life spoke about it at any length and I had trouble understanding it. Now, it is so plain and clear it is amazing at the level of acceptance that exists. It is too simple to devote much time to, as it turns out. I can no longer uphold my oath before the courts. At least I still have my integrity.

taketh

Doesn't it seem clear now that she is taking direction from Trump's attorneys? Is that legal?

glorianolan

Trust Weissman. Intelligent man with lots of experience in his field.

pjcguy

The Bar Association needs to rid us of judges like Cannon

edwardlittlehawk

Silence, often perceived as golden, can indeed be the enemy of good, particularly when it stifles communication, perpetuates ignorance, and allows injustice to persist unchecked.

When individuals or groups choose silence over speaking out, critical issues may go unresolved. Constructive dialogue is essential for addressing problems, finding solutions, and fostering innovation. Silence in these contexts can lead to misunderstandings, stagnation, and missed opportunities for improvement.

Silence in the face of misinformation or harmful ideologies allows them to spread unchallenged. By not speaking out, individuals inadvertently enable the perpetuation of falsehoods and prevent the dissemination of accurate, helpful information.

Silence can be complicit in the face of injustice. When people do not speak up against discrimination, corruption, or abuse, they allow such actions to continue. Silence can be seen as passive acceptance or endorsement of wrongdoing, further entrenching systemic issues.

On a personal level, silence can hinder emotional expression and growth. Keeping silent about feelings or concerns can lead to internalized stress and hinder personal development. On a collective level, communities and organizations that do not encourage open dialogue may struggle to grow and adapt.

Holding individuals or institutions accountable requires speaking out. Silence can shield those in power from scrutiny and prevent necessary reforms. Transparency and accountability thrive in environments where open communication is valued.

In essence, while there are situations where silence is appropriate or necessary, being silent about important issues can hinder progress, justice, and personal well-being. It is often through the courageous act of speaking out that positive change is initiated and sustained.

elab

She needs to be out judges are suppose objective and follow the law.

jotorklucylu

Didn’t DT say that he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and not loose approval; then he whined about federal agents having guns when they entered Mar a Lago? He is so gross and inconsistent

celiakane

nuclear documents. Classification of these documents is by statute, not by EO 13526 or its predecessors. Specifically, these are classified directly via the Atomic Energy Act.
In this group, document #19 is special. This is Formerly Restricted Data, and is classified by virtue of the Atomic Energy Act (as implemented by 10 CFR part 1045). Trump could not have declassified this document even while president—at least not directly. It is National Defense Information by statute, not by executive order.
By statute, documents are classified under the Atomic Energy Act if the Department of Energy and Department of Defense agree that the document (or category) falls within the categories laid out in the Atomic Energy Act. If DOE and DOD disagree, the President can break the tie (in either direction). This means the President could in principle force documents to be declassified by directing the relevant Secretaries to declassify the documents (and firing them if they don’t comply). But critically: the process must occur for the document to be declassified. It is not “at will” declassification by the President.
The Charges

31 counts of Wilful Retention of National Defense Information — 18 USC 793(e)

Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice — 18 USC 1512(k)

Withholding a Document or Record — 18 USC 1512 (b)(2)(A), and abetting

Corrupting concealing a Document or Record — 18 USC 1512[c](1), and abetting

Concealing a Document in a Federal Investigation — 18 USC 1519, and abetting

Scheme to Conceal — 18 USC 1001(a)(1), and abetting

False Statements and Representations — 18 USC 1001(a)(2), and abetting

15 boxes provided by Trump to NARA in January 2022. These contained 197 classified documents: 98 at SECRET; 30 at TOP SECRET; the remainder at Confidential. Some additionally had Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) and Special Access Program (SAP) markings.

During the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago Club, a further 102 documents, recovered from Trump’s office and a storage room. These included 17 documents at TOP SECRET; 54 at SECRET; 31 at CONFIDENTIAL. Of these, Trump’s office held 6 at TOP SECRET; 18 at SECRET; and 3 at CONFIDENTIAL.

barbaragdisis

Baby judges should get help from more experienced judges

celiakane

I am so happy to see you on utube I never missed your show in five years I am having trouble with connecting to MSNBC so to watch you again makes me happy

lucyg

Note how easy it is to spot the trolls by the childishness, bad grammar and spelling. Even for the most stunningly simpleton comments. And even with spell-check!

LogicAndReason

Former CIA acting director warns U.S. faces serious terrorist attack threat
A little over a week from now the 2024 presidential candidates will debate for the first time this election cycle. The most important part of their job: Keeping Americans safe. Former CIA acting director Michael Morrel joins CBS News to discuss the terror danger he sees.
JUN 18, 2024

Lee-xfbk