Big Think Interview With Paul Bloom | Big Think

preview_player
Показать описание
Big Think Interview With Paul Bloom
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Bloom:

Paul Bloom is the Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology at Yale University. An internationally recognized expert on the psychology of child development, social reasoning, and morality, he has won numerous awards for his research, writing, and teaching. Bloom’s previous books include Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil and How Pleasure Works: The New Science of Why We Like What We Like, and he has written for Science, Nature, The New York Times, and The New Yorker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:

Question: What challenges arise in doing research with young children?

Paul Bloom: I think there's tremendous insight to be gained by looking at babies and young children. It's basically a way of seeing human nature before it gets tainted and corrupted by culture and if you test them young enough, before it gets even affected by language. So it's a way of seeing human nature in a very direct and sort of untainted way. But it's really difficult working with kids and with babies because they are not cooperative subjects, they are not socialized into the idea that they should cheerfully and cooperatively give you information. They're not like undergraduates, who you can bribe with beer money or course credit. And so you need to be somewhat clever in designing studies that tap their knowledge. You have to tap their knowledge indirect and sometimes kind of interesting and subtle ways. And even when you do that, you know, some of them are just going to run away from you. Some babies are going to fall asleep and cry. Some kids are going to think it's hilarious to answer every question with the opposite that, you know, they believe to be true.

And so you have to work around that in all sorts of ways. But as a developmental psychologist, I'm committed to the idea that the benefits outweigh the costs.

Question: How has your research affected your parenting and vice versa?

Paul Bloom: It's funny, I don't think, I'll be honest, I don't think anything I've ever learned as a developmental psychologist, as a scientist, has affected how I treat my kids. I think that at this stage of the game, there's a real disjunct between what the science tells us and actual practical applications, and I would distrust someone who told you otherwise.

But there's been a lot going around on the other way around. I mean, having kids has proven to be this amazing, for me, this amazing source of ideas of anecdotes, of examples, I can test my own kids without human subject permission so they pilot, I pilot my ideas on them. And so it is a tremendous advantage to have kids if you're going to be a developmental psychologist.

Question: Why does religious belief exist?

Paul Bloom: Most humans are religious. If you ask most people, they'll tell you they belong to one or another religion. The most common religion on earth is Christianity, but Islam is coming a close second. And then there's just all sorts of religions. They differ in many ways, both in the beliefs that they have and in their practices, but they share certain common properties. So, all religions believe in some sort of supernatural entities, preachers without bodies, but have minds, like gods and spirits and ghosts and angels. All religions believe that one or more of these supernatural created the earth and created animals and created us. And they all believe in different forms, that we can survive the death of our body, that we are immortal.

And I'm very interested in where these beliefs come from, why they exist at all. And you can imagine different extremes, so some scholars argue that they're social constructions, they're inventions of culture, and that's why they're universal. Others argue they're biological adaptations. They exist because of the selective advantage they gave to our ancestors.

I have a view which is different from both of those. I think they're accidents. I think they're accidental byproducts of cognitive systems that we've evolved for different reasons. More specifically, we've evolved a highly powerful social cognition. A highly powerful cognitive mechanism for thinking about the mental states of others and evaluating them and judging them. And I think that the system is so powerful that it sometimes leads to certain unpredicted byproducts. Things that we haven't evolved to do. So, for instance, we're highly animistic.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Dr Bloom has an entire course on the yale channel intro to psychology which is beautiful and most informative and mind-axpansive. Descartes Baby is a booook too! Great interview!

oldworldhuman
Автор

Dear Big Think,
I always enjoy your videos and often watch your older videos already released since I have Favorited so many over the years. Please please add closed captions to your older videos!
Please

Unalochy
Автор

Professor ive seen your course on the yale open course website and i have to say that passion you show for your work and for the human mind has inspired me as a 17 year old to go into psychology. I too am very intrigued by the way other people. All my life ever since i was a little kid i always came up with theories as to why this happens or why did that person do that or why is that group like that. Sadly though the little theories i came up with vanished since i never wrote anything down lol

strtodamoney
Автор

Professional proffer of a kind I always love you

samueltheuri
Автор

Children are drawn to imagination not to prepare for the worst case scenario, but to prepare for the real case scenario.

tenseyy
Автор

Could the pervasive belief in an afterlife somehow be tied to the fact that our genes do live on when we pass them on to another generation? When we assume that our beliefs are the byproduct our instincts, and instincts to view life as perpetual could give an evolutionary advantage, could it just be that a belief in an afterlife is just a rationalization of these instincts?

NoWay
Автор

18:50
It reminds me some works on AI (that depends on human memory algorythms) and works on human brain learning during it's life.

VicVlasenko
Автор

Dr.Bloom- I am big fan of yours (my son is a Yale grad student). I have seen a lot of your lectures and really enjoy them (I am trying to see the Psych reason behind that!). Anyway, I did find one anamoly in your lectures. In this Big Think interview you talk about the art that your son Max drew and called it an airplane. I remember hearing the same anecdote in the CHF lecture but you attributed that to your other son Zackary. Is this just a story to illustrate a concept or is this for real? :)

SureshKumar
Автор

Look, I love Paul Bloom, but the stuff from 7:24 is just rehashed psychoanalysis, no matter how simplified the language is

HWalla
Автор

15:55 ... "fart spray?" ... do tell where one can obtain a can of "fart spray?" Never mind... I Googled it. Turns out there are several competing products to choose from (for the fart spray connoisseur). Lol.

byedaway
Автор

There is no morality as such outside of religion - good is what God tells us to do. As Kolakowski said - whoever says that God doesn't exist and that's fine lies to himself. (I'm not even sure if he believed in God, but that was his choice).

pawelwysockicoreandquirks
Автор

Religion: “How can I get money from your pocket in to mine?” Sheep.

davidhamilton
Автор

Where does one buy fart spray that he discusses around 17 mins?

stevebaryakovgindi
Автор

Faith is an Accident! That makes as much sense as the Assumption THAT COMPLEX INTELLIGENT LIFE IS THE PURE RESULT OF AN ACCIDENT. IF FAITH AND BELIEF IN GOD IS ACCIDENTAL SO IS OUT EXISTENCE. THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION WOULD BE THAT LIFE IS A POINT ACCIDENT THAT MERELY PERPETUATES ITSELF.

imperialfederation
Автор

I think this guy needs to leverage ad-hominen attacks against people who are smarter than he is.

jujuandjesus
visit shbcf.ru