Cosine and Sine Functions in terms of Complex Exponentials || Derivation from Euler's Formula

Link to Quantum Playlist:
I introduce mathematical concepts which will be used in subsequent classical and quantum mechanics videos in the playlist above.

#Exponentials
#EulersFormula
#KonstantinLakic

[nathanallan]

Thank you for explaining this in an easy, straightforward manner!

[meghanadhanvai]

I was not getting how formula of cos theta derived i.e e^i....Thank you! Like the explanation

[Rosa-iptk]

Thank you! I have been searching for why my teacher keeps/2 it when the question asks for Euler's form.

[pelasgeuspelasgeus]

Stop parotting and think on your own. Complex numbers is fake invented math because
(1) the definition of a complex number contradicts to the laws of formal logic, because this definition is the union of two contradictory concepts: the concept of a real number and the concept of a non-real (imaginary) number-an image. The concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number are in logical relation of contradiction: the essential feature of one concept completely negates the essential feature of another concept. These concepts have no common feature (i.e. these concepts have nothing in common with each other), therefore one cannot compare these concepts with each other. Consequently, the concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number cannot be united and contained in the definition of a complex number. The concept of a complex number is a gross formal-logical error;
(2) the real part of a complex number is the result of a measurement. But the non-real (imaginary) part of a complex number is not the result of a measurement. The non-real (imaginary) part is a meaningless symbol, because the mathematical (quantitative) operation of multiplication of a real number by a meaningless symbol is a meaningless operation. This means that the theory of complex number is not a correct method of calculation. Consequently, mathematical (quantitative) operations on meaningless symbols are a gross formal-logical error;
(3) a complex number cannot be represented (interpreted) in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system, because the Cartesian coordinate system is a system of two identical scales (rulers). The standard geometric representation (interpretation) of a complex number leads to the logical contradictions if the scales (rulers) are not identical. This means that the scale of non-real (imaginary) numbers cannot exist in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system.