Calculus Early Transcendentals Book Review

🙏Support me by becoming a channel member!

#math #brithemathguy

Disclaimer: This video is for entertainment purposes only and should not be considered academic. Though all information is provided in good faith, no warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made with regards to the accuracy, validity, reliability, consistency, adequacy, or completeness of this information. Viewers should always verify the information provided in this video by consulting other reliable sources. Some of the links below are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through these links, it won't cost you any additional cash, but it will help to support my channel. Thank you!

Here's my review of Calculus Early Transcendentals by Edwards and Penny. Have a great day!

🎓Become a Math Master with my courses!

[ianmii]

It was a standard textbook during my college years, everyone used it.
However, I prefer this list:
Schaum's Differential and Integral Calculus
Schaum's Calculus
Schaum's Advanced Calculus
Leithold's The Calculus with Analytic Geometry
Demidovich's Problems in Mathematical Analysis (MIR Publishers)

[AdityaKumar-ijok]

is Thomas calculus same as this one? both are by Pearson education

[shacharh]

Anyone majoring in Maths needs to understand the proofs from the start. Not necessarily remember every proof indefinitely but understand them for a while, play with it, find counter-examples when any of the proof's assumptions isn't met, be able to prove similar statements (at least some simpler private cases) and so on. This is part of studying maths as far as I understand it. (I'm a maths student myself)

[MANOJTIWARI-nijr]

Please tell books for undergraduate mathematics

[maplelaugh]

Very nice! Do you know anything about the Briggs textbook?

[gilloon]

This is one of the easiest textbooks on calculus, please try Adam and Essex

[sessarichard]

Do you remember all of the theorems from the 1, 000 page calc 1-3 book, or do you have to go refresh?

[Z-Diode]

It’s Calculus for kindergarten. So it’s not a serious textbook.

[lovaaaa]

I'm sorry but it's pretty sad that you say to people taking college level classes that they don't need proofs yet. Honestly what's the point of learning it if one doesn't have the slightest clue about the internal consistency or truth status of the material? How is one suspected to learn higher mathematics using the techniques of calc if one doesn't have a rigorous understanding of say infinitesimals or the concept of measure? Relearn the subject again using another book? Even for non-mathematicians bashing the theorems into one's head without any case for real understanding aught to make the subject dry, tedious and boring for them, thus they will easily forget it again. Obviously I would argue for the classics like Spivak or Apostol but really even if someone uses a book like this it's not good to tell them that proofs aren't that important... Proofs is the reason that mathematics transcends the empiricist sciences and is the only truly timeless area of human knowledge, maybe along with philosophy to some extent.

Still love to see the book reviews, however.