Demystifying SELF-RAG: A Comprehensive Guide with Examples (Exclusive on LlamaIndex!)

preview_player
Показать описание
Happy the Year of Dragon, everyone! 🐲

In this episode, join Mehdi and Angelina as they break down SELF-RAG, the powerful new algorithm now available as part of LlamaPack on the cutting-edge LlamaIndex platform. This game-changer takes Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to the next level, unlocking dynamic capabilities like real-time adaptation and critique.

00:00 Introduction
00:40 What is RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation)?
02:54 What’s good about RAG comparing with ChatGPT?
03:08 What issues does RAG have?
05:04 What’s the solution?
05:52 What is Query Routing?
06:33 How does Self-RAG work?
07:12 What’s reflective token?
07:49 How does Self-RAG know whether to retrieve or not?
09:11 A concrete example
13:27 How does the algorithm work?
14:31 An example output from the model
17:13 Self-evaluation and critique from retrieval
18:49 Model performance overview
19:35 Benefit for RAG developers - why use this?

🔨 Implementation:

📝 Paper:

Stay tuned for more content! 🎥 Thanks you for watching! 🙌
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So, training the model brings up the same problem we've had before: how to extract useful training data from things like PDF files. I still maintain that it is absolutely necessary to obey the document structure (at a minimum) to extract useful keys (blobs that will be embedded and then stored in the vector database). Your later video that talks about extracting summaries and embedding those as keys in the database applies here, I think. It shouldn't be all that difficult to create some good heuristics that can handle different type of, say, PDF files: some are papers, some are books. A book has less obvious structure (e.g., numbered headings) than an academic paper (we hope :), so these two types, at least, should be handled differently. Creating snippets of text to embed from a book is possibly a much more difficult task. I guess if we have an LLM with a big enough context, we could present the entire book to the LLM and ask it to generate snippets of text to use as keys. For example, "give me some summaries of the main characters in the book. What are their names, their genders, their main activities, their relationships to other characters, and so forth."

briancase
Автор

I don't really see the benefit over recent RAG development such as sub-document summary as metadata with each chunk for retrieval.

AngusLou