AP Biology 2024 - FRQ Question 2 SOLVED!

License code: ZRGPRTZA6IJR71WY
#chipmanbiology #chipmanapbiology

[dobby]

I may be wrong, but I believe for the graph it was 20 squares for the x-axis and 30 for the y-axis

[ryanepic]

So if for the graph I completely forgot how to make a key for it and I instead wrote oxygen and ATP under each respective bar that they aligned with, is there any world in which that could be accepted? I forgot I can just partially shade in one of em cause I was just thinking about making the error bars still visible so I had no clue what to do

[adams]

The graph was 20 boxes across and 30 high I believe

[alphaanimated]

For (di), I wrote there will be no ATP produced and for (dii), I justified it by saying H+ protons would be unable to go down the ATP Synthase and ADP and inorganiz phosphate would not be converted to ATP. Would this get me any points? Thank you.

[sebastian-ywxg]

God I thought that they were trying to trick you and get you to multiply by 100 and I only multiplied by 10

[theknowitall]

For my graph, I was off by 0.5 on a single bar (I put 21.5 instead of 21.07), but everything else was correct. My scale was also at 1, so I was only off by less than a square on my graph. I did everything else correctly though. Will this lose me a point on the graph, or not?

[notjackk]

i think i might've lost 2 points, i explained that protons will build up because they have no atp synthase to diffuse through, but i accidentally mixed up the matrix and the ims, and i think i said that protons will build up in the matrix. maybe they'll give it to me because my explanation made it more obvious that it was a mixup? hopefully..

[pyro]

For the predict question, I said something how it would have a negative affect on the Proton Gradient, than I explained everything in detail like what you said in the justify part. Would I get the point for the predict question or was I too vague in my prediction. I thought my explaining would have to go to the justify part

[Kailenks]

For the graph, could you have done a stacked bar chart or did it have to be separate bars and I didn’t shade the bars but I did label the Y axis relative to the bars if that makes sense

[GrantEvans]

For c(ii), it’s saying for 10mg of protein after 10 minutes. Therefore, a mg every minute. So 16.5x10, right? Because it’s not 10mg every minute FOR 10 minutes; it’s 10mg after the 10 minutes is complete. So if it’s 16.5nmol in one minute, it would be 165 after 10 minutes. It’s going at an average rate of 1mg per minute. 10mg after 10 minutes. Unless I’m reading it wrong? This question was so weird to understand.

[groundcuminu]

would i still be granted the point if i didnt have time to write the units for y axis nmol/mg/min. I did the graph last second and was able to get every single bar down, error bars, x axis labels and a key too

[reese]

For the hydrolysis question, would they still take it even if I didn’t mention the phosphate groups at all?

[breanna]

if i said for a that you add water to hydrolyze atp, is that too general lol

[AishaniBhattacharya]

i did a line graph instead of a bar graph is that ok?

[rileycain]

Do you know roughly the percentage I need correct in order to get a 5?