What Are Neutrinos? | How The Universe Works

preview_player
Показать описание
What are neutrinos? Where do they come from? Why can't we feel then and how do we detect them? Find out on How The Universe Works.

Subscribe to Discovery UK for more great clips:

Follow Discovery UK on Twitter:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Man flavour changing neutrinos sounds delicious

darshan.babaji
Автор

I instantly covered my nail when he said neutrinos were going through it. What a lack of privacy we're living on these modern days...

FiloSophia
Автор

I gotta feeling observation in science has been overly conceptualized by our large, sometimes to big for our own good, human brains. "To see something is not to understand it" our ego will never allow this truth to be

jasonhiggins
Автор

please add closed captions/subtitles, thank you!

qdrbvqf
Автор

My question is....if they are EXTREMELY hard to detect, how can they detect so many coming from a super nova from far away? And if they are neutral how can they have a flavor that has electricity in its name?

Clevelander
Автор

Now i know why my neutrino icecream keeps changing its flavour every time i take a bite of it

yecto
Автор

They lost me when they said neutrino flavors 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

TimCasey
Автор

I went to the stor, and asked a nutrino vanilla flavor. It was delicious You should try it. It's very nutrinoticional

Papiringou
Автор

I feel ya neutrino, so misunderstood! lol

JeffAPierson
Автор

Nothing wants to go out with a fizz.. Go out with a BANG!

jasonhiggins
Автор

Experiment to establish whether neutrinos have mass: get a beam of neutrinos to race a beam of light across a vast distance, and if they start at the same instant and arrive at the same instant, that means they dont have mass. Particles with mass cannot travel at the speed of light. If we knew the exact moment a distant star had gone supernova, and the photons and neutrinos arrived here at the same instant, that woul be ideal. The snag is in determining the exact moment when the supernova exploded. If we sent an atomic bomb to the surface of Mars, waited till Mars was its maximum distance from us, then exploded the bomb, we could see whether the light arrived at the exact instant as the neutrinos.

bernardedwards
Автор

This didn’t answer what they were. Just what they do. From the process of nuclear fission they’re produced how?

thegavin
Автор

Chocolate chip cookies and neutrino flavored milk, UHH! 👌 To die for 😋🥰

rondizzel
Автор

I saw and was amazed by the image of the interior of the sun obtained by the neutrino detector in Japan. how can we increase the resolution of such an image? can we use the same principle from optics or radio? I mean interferometry. instead of building a huge super detector locally, could we build more but smaller ones? spread across the globe at depth?

eugen-m
Автор

Well, that neutrino literally is an example of imagination is the limit😂

jacklord
Автор

I heard that the neutrinos can be emitted from neutrons too, especially from electron capture decay events where electrons collide with protons to form neutrons. Is this right?

MWproification
Автор

What would happen if there was a material that could ABSORB neutrinos instead of them passing through?

terryquick
Автор

Imagine if they did some crazy synthetic stem cell surrogacy program in the 80s that developed bodies that could absorb neutrinos

MAW
Автор

I’m here because of video from 12 years ago gave me absolutely no answer

hempwire
Автор

Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)

Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together.

String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension?

What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957–8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)

The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?

When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.

Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.

Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.

Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?

Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?

Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons

. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules.

Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.


Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.

In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.

1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface

137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.

The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)


How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?


Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?



I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. The model grew out of that simple idea.

I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.

SpotterVideo