Repugnant Conclusion: Philosophy A-Level

: In this captivating exploration of ethical theory, we tackle the enigmatic Repugnant Conclusion. Join us as we dissect this thought-provoking concept that challenges our intuitions about population ethics. From Derek Parfit's groundbreaking work to contemporary debates, we navigate through the complexities of utilitarianism, consequentialism, and the value of life itself. Whether you're a seasoned philosopher or an eager learner, this video offers invaluable insights into one of the most perplexing dilemmas in moral philosophy. Subscribe now to dive deeper into the fascinating world of philosophical inquiry and ethical reasoning!

[luryn.]

Hi could you please do a video on exam technique? Like how to write a top band 25 mark essay or a top band 12 mark answer?

[AsianPhilosophiesUnveiled]

Really love your vids. Metaethics would be class if you could go over it before the exam this year.

[JM-usfr]

5:28 In order for this reasoning to work, the population that you added in A+ should have an extremely low quality of life, at least as bad as population Z. Otherwise, repeating this process could never converge to population Z.

[nylathomas]

thank you - with adding this to a 25 would you just slot it in as a further criticism of bentham's failure to account for fairness indiv liberty etc? or would you consider adding it in somewhere else?

[milliepugh_]

Is this similar to the Pig Philosophy criticism?