How to Execute a Mutable Function After Immutable in Rust

Learn how to effectively manage mutable and immutable references in Rust to resolve common borrowing issues, specifically in a stack operation scenario.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How do I execute a mutable function after immutable?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Overcoming Borrow Checker Challenges in Rust

When you're working with Rust, one of the most common issues you'll encounter revolves around the borrowing rules of mutable and immutable references. Specifically, you might find yourself grappling with how to execute a mutable function after performing an immutable operation.

In this guide, we'll break down a common scenario involving stack operations in a virtual machine. We'll explain the problem and provide a step-by-step guide to solving it effectively.

The Problem: Mutable vs. Immutable Borrowing

Consider a situation where you need to take two items from a stack that you've implemented in Rust. You want to peek (access) the top item without removing it, and then take (remove) that item.

Here's a simplified overview of the operations you're performing:

PEEK: Get the value without removing it from the stack.

TAKE: Remove the top item from the stack.

PEEK: Get the value beneath the previously accessed item.

However, you may run into a borrowing issue like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why Does This Error Occur?

This leads to two main complications:

You cannot have mutable and immutable references to the same data simultaneously.

The mutable reference cannot be created until the immutable one goes out of scope.

The Solution: Two Approaches to Resolve the Issue

Fortunately, there are two effective strategies you can employ to resolve this kind of borrowing conflict.

Approach 1: Return Struct Instead of Reference

One way to handle this situation is to modify your peek function to return the struct directly instead of a reference. This avoids creating an immutable reference altogether.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By returning a value (the instance itself), you eliminate the borrowing issue since there won’t be a reference hanging around once the function call is complete.

Approach 2: Explicitly Drop the Immutable Borrow

If you prefer to keep your existing structure, you can explicitly manage when the immutable borrow is dropped. This can be done by copying the needed value out of the apple variable before taking the mutable borrow. Here's how you can implement this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Summary

By understanding how Rust enforces its borrowing rules, you can effectively navigate the challenges of mutable and immutable data access.

Remember: You cannot have simultaneous mutable and immutable references to the same data.

Choose: Modify the function to return structures instead of references, or explicitly control the scope of your references to avoid borrowing conflicts.

With these strategies, you'll find it easier to manage data accesses in Rust, allowing for cleaner and safer code.

If you're developing complex systems that require these concepts, streamlining your approach to stack operations can drastically enhance your coding experience in Rust.