Should traditional Catholics be using the Pre-1955 missal?

Please Like this video with Thumbs Up Button 👍🏻 and Share this video on Facebook using the "Share" Button next to Like Button.

------------------------------------------------------------
🙏🏻WILL YOU PLEASE HELP ME GROW THIS CHANNEL AND PODCAST? 🙏🏻
▶️ 1. 🔔 Don’t miss a Youtube CATHOLIC LIVESTREAM: Please click Subscribe, then Click "Notification Bell" = 🔔 and select “all” to be notified of all new shows and CATHOLIC LIVESTREAMS.
▶️ 2. 👍🏻 Please "Like" this video.
▶️ 3. 📲 Please share this video on Facebook and Twitter using the SHARE button.
▶️ 8. 🐦 Follow Dr Taylor Marshall on Social Media:

🔴 YouTube: Click Subscribe, then Click "Notification Bell" = 🔔 (all)

[josephkramer]

I got the 1962 missal before getting the pre 1955 missal. I can see for myself, the pre 1955 missal is far superior when it comes to everything around the mass.

[RA-lkvz]

Breaking with tradition is breaking with The Holy Spirit.

[kjhammer]

Yes let's all throw tomatoes at the SSPX to reassure the modernists the division among the traditional groups. Lord have mercy on us.

[zeldazeidantarazi]

God bless you and your family members and stay safe, after what we heard about the school in Texas

[glennrogers]

Wow! Thank you for breaking this down for us. Over my head but understand it better…
Praised be Jesus Christ.

[an_tAthair_Criostoir]

I use pre-55 missals when I can and ALWAYS use the pre-50 breviary. We trads however really ought to use the missal, breviary, ritual, and pontifical as they existed in 1903. This altogether circumvents the problematic changes of the 20th century.

[tonygomes]

I got Father Lasance Missal. Just two weeks in my hands

[Nicole-kems]

Things happen to me that just don't seem right like receiving communion on good Friday then I find out we didn't always do that.

[tonysaid]

Right now, the most important thing is that sincere truth loving Catholics get the the Salvation Doctrine of the Church right. Everything and epecially prayer is built on the foundation of Orthodoxy. We are where we are now because the heresy of salvation outside the Church, that is, without the true faith in Christ, and the Sacrament of Baptism, was accepted already well before Vatican infiltrated 98% of the clergy and the papacy.

[geoffwilson]

Completely agree! Although, if it’s not in the missal, there should be a 1955 revised version to include Our Lady of Fatima and some of the 20th century Saints (who are actually credible) in the Calendar.

[teresaoftheandes]

I use the 62, but loved my St. Andrew Missal unfortunately it's falling apart.

[leontinemarie]

The ‘62 was a bridge missal to the new mass, it is not sufficient. May be streamlined and less weighty but insufficient. I have always used the St. Andrew.

[nildarodriguez]

I use the the 1962 so I'm way ahead if you can even compare it to the NO. If later on it changes, It will be ok as long as it isn't the NO.

[mosesking]

And why use the 1911 Pius X breviary? We need the original breviary composed and used for over 1500 years. The monastic Benedictine breviary is superior in this regard.

[NoSoulLeftBehind]

SSPX doesn't want to be accused of schism, so Lefebvre insisted they use the 62.

[lilyst.pierre]

Many people at the SSPX Holy Mass I attend use the St. Andrew missal or the Fr. Lasance missal or the St. Joseph missals from the 1950's. Not true "they only do the 1962".

[shur]

I still have my pre 1960 missal where mass is written in latin and English translation

[bodhionultimateride]

Archbishop Lefebvre said:
“The basic principle of the Society’s thinking and action in the painful crisis the Church is going through is the principle taught by St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica (II, II, q. 33, a.4). That one may not oppose the authority of the Church except in the case of imminent danger to the Faith. Now, there is no danger for the Faith in the liturgy of Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII, whereas there is great danger for the Faith in the liturgy of Pope Paul VI, which is unacceptable.”

[annakimborahpa]

Nothing later than 1957. In 1958 General Motors introduced the Edsel which only lasted two years in production.

[scottgauley]

What's your opinion on using the St. Pius X reformed breviary Dr. Marshall? I know it caused quite the uproar among the clergy when first instituted.