Battlefield 1 Unrealistic? Game Realism vs Game Fun

preview_player
Показать описание


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It would be cool if they included a"realistic" mode. You can only pick from the standard issue weapons and gear from your faction.

MTR
Автор

If Battlefield was nothing but bolt actions, people would complain with "OH MY GOD, NOT ENOUGH CONTENT!!" I think people will complain no matter what .-.

TheMajorLeagueGinger
Автор

Are we really going to complain about how accurate a WORLD WAR 1 game is?

Caleb
Автор

"Games are supposed to be fun, not realistic!"
"OMG, look how realistic the graphics look! Your gun gets covered in mud and the houses fall down when you shoot dem :O"
I don't understand :c

lsm
Автор

Well it's set in WW1, but everybody runs around shooting each other point blank with submachine guns, so I'm gonna hazard a "no"

michaelmartin
Автор

If I wanted realism I would go down the street to the recruiting station

NotTheOrigamiKiller
Автор

Battlefield lives from creating a relative realism, Battlefield 1 fails this entirely for the period its set in.

Eric-uemm
Автор

Rolls Royce armored car in battlefield 1 is faster than modern Humvee

DrEvil-sjym
Автор

Verdun player here
Battlefield 1 looks great it might not be historically accurate but who gives a single fuck, you don't play game to learn history (if you do sorry) you play game to have fun there is nothing fun about getting spawn killed 6 times in a row trying to leave your trench/spawn (looking at you verdun) so i think that they made the perfect decision with this game.

Blue-bvur
Автор

We DON'T care about realism.
We DO care about fun.

iguitorjdroid
Автор

Who the fuck wants historic accuracy? EA and DICE are not gonna make a slow pace game because it's not gonna sell. People need to get over this..

edgards
Автор

To make more realistic they should add GORE. Like the COD World at War with legs and arms flying all around

lcs
Автор

I'm sure theres going to be certain servers dedicated to the realism of ww1 where only bolt actions are allowed.

Moneysreal
Автор

You are right, Battlefield 1 IS unrealistic, but the Rolls Royce Armoured Car could in fact go up to 72 kph! Believe it or not!

ivannoreland
Автор

It feels like the developers got scared about using genuine WW1 weapons and just defaulted to a standard shooter type game. After all, these games are about making money, not authenticity. And the reality is 12 year olds don't want bolt action rifles, they want pow pow kablam jump leap roll boom!!! This game could have broken the mould. But instead it's just another war game. Right down to the colourful HUD icons. It doesn't feel like WW1. It doesn't even feel like WW2. Both those wars were muddy, miserable and brutal. This feels like it was designed to convert kiddies from the COD franchise.

Zenrising_YTCM_President
Автор

this just plays into what i said last week BF1 is a WW2 style shooter with a WW1 skin

GreyShot
Автор

Ofc its unrealistic?!
Every battlefield in the history of BF was unrealistic?!

fredw
Автор

It's not that I want ultra realism in BF1, it's just I wish they would stray a little bit from the standard Battlefield gameplay
format. Making it a bit slower paced and more tactical would be nice, rather than just BF4 with a WW1 mod....

JeeshanChoudhury
Автор

The word you're looking for is authenticity. No game is realistic (unless it's like Arma or something).

nahbsh
Автор

If battlefield WAS realistic then:
Light tank(Renault Ft-17): 6 Km/h
Medium Tank(Mark IV): 5 Km/h
Heavy Tank(A7V Sturmpanzerwagen): 8 Km/h

Do you see how fast the A7V travels? ( Actually all the vehicles move very slow still.. )

cloroxbleach
welcome to shbcf.ru