A Blue Supergiant Star Mysteriously Disappeared, Baffling Astronomers!

A Blue Supergiant Star Mysteriously Disappeared, Baffling Astronomers!

We have previously covered the case of the mysteriously vanishing stars. These were all red stars with higher proper motion compared to other stars. Now astronomers have been left perplexed by the unexplained disappearance of a massive blue variable star. Lets see what we can find out about this star. Astronomers have 2 different theories for explaining this, firstly it was a supernova explosion that happened over 10 years ago that we just happened to miss, and secondly that it was a blue variable star that simply collapsed into black hole without any supernova brightening. What can the electric universe model tell us instead that might have occurred?

Please consider supporting this channel through:

Follow me on:

References:

#electricuniverse #plasmauniverse #seethepattern

[shockwave]

more disappearing stars fun times !!! is it mathemagic ?no its reality and no bang to witness the disappearing of a star how are they going to explain oh ya it will fade away and never be spoken of again cause if the glove dont fit then they quit, , , , i meant acquit

[fisheatinweasel]

I often wonder, about the stars and galaxies "arranged like pearls on a string", and the regularity of their spacing along the current. Is this a relatively static situation, or are the stars moving directionally? Or, are they in some sort of longitudinal resonance with one another, such that they behave like a Slinky(tm) of bar magnets? What happens when BK is overwhelmed by the interaction of two Z's?, Change in polarity of one, or both stars? What effect does this have on the other 'pearls', both in immediate proximity, and throughout the 'cosmosystem'?
Planets. Are they on the concentric shells of a BK? Is the longitudinal velocity of matter, in and between the shells, identical and co-directional? Charge? Gas giants? Cold magnetars? Venus? Is it possible for a planet to 'jump' to another star's influence during close approach and recoil between stars? Saturn Myths? What happens when a star is influence by a 'stronger' star? Can that star, robbed of its dominance of a segment of the BK, be relegated to a lower energy shell of the dominant star, and thus become a planet? Gas giants? What happens to the resident planets of the weaker star? Inclusion and redistribution? Ejection? Eject to where? Random?
What is the definition of a star? Magnetism? Energy signature - heat, light, radio, X/γ? Satellites: planets/moons (def.?)? Other? Bowshock. Magnetotail. Heliosphere. (e.g. @5:00)
Blue supergiant. Non-metallic. When two stars are forced, along the current, to a point of acute repulsion, what does it look like? Crash? 'CLACK!', like two billiard balls? Why would they not simply merge? Is the radiance a posterior attribute of the 'collision'? Pizo-? Would the stars survive? What would be the subsequent affect upon the BK and the matter under its influence?
What could cause a perturbation in a BK? Interaction between BK's? What happens when they cross? Short circuit? When welding, do we see the 'glow' of hyper-excited metal? Or are we seeing the aura of the discharge itself?
Enough questions. Thank you for the imagination.

[willembont]

Very interesting. Nice presentation. Thanks.

[rubenanthonymartinez]

As stars disappear, a new paradigm is emerging! Some what poetic.

[ShifuCareaga]

A good hint. But imo not going to lead to a smoking gun due to distance.

I do not think fusion is purely about pressure during the arcing process.

This strikes me as a situation where current is so high that the particle fuel for the plasma is used up and so the circuit "fuses out" meaning pops off and there is no current flow at the moment. The star has returned to a simpler state.

[willyouwright]

OK well, , , what we dont want to do is try to find ways of explaining things we need to just focus on observation. This is why current day physics is so corupt.. because they care less about observation and more about assumption and theories.. Lets just observe and see what comes of that..

[nearth]

Interesting mystery. I want to know who the heck lost a MASSIVE giant blue star? I mean, one might just notice if it went through the laundry or fell through some random crack somewhere.
The superlatives packed into this short video left my mind spinning.
Wait, all of me is spinning.
Shucks, the whole world is spinning, right?
RIGHT????

[Matt-rnub]

I had a thought, but I don't know if it's probable, or plausible.
The universe expands, and it is said, that the expansionspeed will, or already has, exceed the speed of light. Could it have been, that this star had together with the expansion exceeded the speed of light? If so, then the light would never reach us again. That's why the star suddenly disappeared, because it had exceeded the speed of light.

[Marcusstratus]

Hmmm that blurred spectral line concept is new to me, though not surprising

[shockwave]

would palnets orbiting such a star just fly off as the power is lower or would they move closer to their star ? im sure the star is getting power still just way less and is in dark mode, , or could be its region of space and the elements in that gas cloud in the area its in

[michaelglenning]

Diehold Foundation, who has a YouTube channel has a theory on disappearing Stars. The dust cloud from a cyclical mini Nova obscures the light.

[JoeDeglman]

There are plasmoid studies that indicate that an electrical surge can cause the core to be ejected. @t
A star needs a core in order to produce light output, such a core ejection can cause the star to stop emitting light at that frequency. The light output of a galaxy indicates that a galaxy cannot have a solid core, so this is perhaps how a blue star along the galactic filaments can be modified into a galaxy, by simply ejecting its core. ?

[jrgmty]

Will they find dark mode galaxies that are shut down. The process should work on the galactic scale too. Present sensor technology can only detect what's thrown at them. If the objects are "dead" there is no way to detect them yet.

[nickprohoroff]

If modern cosmology keeps stumbling over these unpredictable and outrageous events, perhaps it needs to re think its initial theories and assumptions. Re-boot please.

[chloewinkworthartist]

there was an electromagnetic surge, the star got big, the surge was based on juxtaposition, and when the circuit stopped surging so did the star...perhaps.

[KCUDX]

>yawn< this is so simple to explain. It first lit up because it ran out of dark energy in its evolution. Then, it had a random collision with some dark matter, which broke up and covered it. Obvious.

[rogerscottcathey]

Well one thing it proves is the idea a black hole is at the center of every star.

[waitwhat]

This kind of stuff kills me. OK. We have more stars in the universe than grains of sand on this planet. The time span for our observations is shorter than the most rapid eye blink. We "see" something "strange" to our eyes and we go into a fit of speculation. Which leads to nothing more than a plethora of speculation. Is it really possible that we can pigeon hole ANY cosmological event with the current tools and with our very short observation time?

[badpexalpha]

This may sound crazy but me and a friend saw a supernova in dec -January of 1997 we live in lower Central Maine and it took place in the eastern sky the star grew to about the size of a dime getting bigger and brighter and then it just disappeared it took about 12 minutes.

[davidwilkie]

"Metal poor", Quantum Field Logic would indicate that these coherence-cohesion objectives vanishing-into-no-thing Perspective should be recognised as Flashed inside-outside holographic sync-duration connectivity of Singularity-point, Sublimation-Tunnelling tuning-probability, and therefore the whole emission spectrum that includes the Periodic Table of Atomic Form following e-Pi-i Fusion Function will reflect the collective tuning of the Observable Eternity-now location. (? IMO)