Offshore Tax Planning - don’t do this

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Make use of deductions to reduce the total taxable income.

theresaquiera
Автор

Can you do a long-form video on this and explain the correct way to structure this

makasher
Автор

They closed this loophole up in Australia years ago. Good to see that Canada can still do it

thomassparks
Автор

No. First mistake in your calculation is that you must be owner of all 3 companies involved. Only then you can fully exploit Barbados company.
Your manufacturing value of goods in Canada is 100$, you sell that for 120$, so Canada will tax 20$, Barbados company is selling your goods to US company for 200$. US company is selling that on US market for 220$. US tax 20$ of profit, Barbados company is taxable for 80$ at 2.5%, that's 2$, so you have 78$ tax free.
Better is to exclude Canada and use China with which Barbados have DTA in force. Canadian authorities can see only contracts between Canadian and Barbados, but not between Barbados and US, so they can't know for which price goods are sold and where.
Also Canadian jurisdiction ends at its borders, they can't have insight in company register of other countries.

st-sjcf
Автор

You have very nice handwriting

Would love to hear longer talks on this topic

Bluecouchtherapy
Автор

Barbados company needed some economic substance

TheBunnyDeveloper
Автор

So it's better to sell it from the Barbados company 100% instead of splitting

TadhgerLily
Автор

Seems kinda unfair. What gives the Canadian govt any right over one man’s private property and the way they sell it ?
The way I see it, he’s not harming anyone that way.
Just saving on taxes.
Using his private corporations which is “NOT” listed on the Canadian stock exchange.
Also, in a totally different jurisdiction.

JVJ_
Автор

Absolutely clear and onesided pristine case of Transfer pricing gone wrong. No one well informed within the TP community right now will be doing these type of insane manauvers. Dempe functions are being scrutinized deeply. Pillar 1 amount B streamlined process is not being applied yet, but if does it will cut off all these type of simple distribution structures.

bibu
Автор

love your hypothetical example bring them all

mariacicarelli
Автор

SOooo 🤔 what's the right way to do it??
Obviously just asking for a friend🙄

letmelick
Автор

Incorporation of companies/corporation are to be REGISTERED as Domestic or International companies and corporation, as Licensees, Franchisors-Owners and Franchisees where PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, COPYRIGHTS and ALL TAXES Classifications and REGISTRATIONS are Implemented amongst countries, where the businesses locations amongst countries are DECLARED addresses as SMES in businesses are Worldwide, SMALL, MEDIUM, ENTERPRISE, NON-REVERSE or FLIP, since it is also DECLARED with respective LGU units for requirements and permits, in all classifications for businesses are to APPLY, Reflected and applied in the books of the CORPORATION, respective Incorporators and its Articles.

Rod-bpow
Автор

I've been doing this for ages 😅😅😅

suliwa
Автор

So the people stealing the money said they don't think not being able to steal it is bad for them. Go figure.

EdwardVarner
Автор

So you hire a few employees in Barbados at low wages and they’re in the clear?

botsareeverywhere
Автор

Please do something similar for self-employment

oliver_
Автор

The profit is 100% reasonable, let the company make their money

harrynelson
Автор

No way I was thinking about this the other day cheers bro

poleers
Автор

well, then the canadian government can burn to the fucking ground if they consider this unreasonable

opqtkuh
Автор

Just leave Canada or US in favor other country where tax isn’t theft.

timebroua
visit shbcf.ru