A Nice Trick to Degenerate This Equation Instantly | Polish Maths Olympiad Finals 2013

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

For the expression 4x^4-4x^3+1. We know that for x=0 it is a perfect square. For x<>0, we have (2x^2-x)>0 for x integer. Hence (2x^2-x-1)^2 = 4x^4-4x^3 -3x^2 +2x+1< 4x^4-4x^3+1. Which means 4x^4-4x^3+1>=(2x^2-x)^2 --> x=+-1.. So only x=0, x=1, x=-1.

danilonascimentorj
Автор

if you still read comments, could you explain how the idea for the claim with polynomial bounds came about? that didn't seem very intuitive to me

pecfexfextus
Автор

Nice trick indeed.
Another approach: let's substitute y=kx then the equation is: x^4-x^3-k^2x^2+kx=0 and x(x^3-x^2-k^2x+k)=0.
The first trivial case is x=0 then (putting x=0 to the original equation) we have y=0 or y=1.
The roots of the cubic x^3-x^2-k^2x+k=0 should divide k so x=1, -1, k or -k.
For x=1 we have -k^2+k=0 so k=0 or k=1 hence y=kx=(0)(1)=0 or y=kx=(1)(1)=1.
For x=-1 we have -2+k^2+k=0 so k=1 or k=-2 hence y=kx=(1)(-1)=-1 or y=kx=(-2)(-1)=2.
For x=k we have k-k^2=0 so k=0 or k=1 hence x=k=0 and y=kx=(0)(0)=0 or x=k=1 and y=kx=(1)(1)=1.
For x=-k we have k-k^2=0 so k=0 or k=1 hence x=-k=0 and y=kx=(0)(0)=0 or x=-k=-1 and y=kx=(1)(-1)=-1.
Finally we have 6 pairs: (-1;-1), (-1;2); (0;0), (0;1), (1;0), (1;1).
This approach doesn't require the assumption that x and y are integers.

StaR-uwdc
Автор

What I did below is wrong.
For this case y= s*a~3 and y-1= t*b^3, with s*a^3-t*b^3=1 and I was not abble to criate any contradction for this case.
So the solution above is not valid!
My apologies!

I did in a diferent way.
x^3(x-1)=y(y-1) And gcd(y, y-1)=gcd(x^3;x-1)=1
we have ab=cd and a, b are coprimes and c, d also.
Then or (a=0 and (c=0 or d=0)) or (b=0 and (c=0 or d=0)) or (a=c and b=d) or (a=-c and b=-d)) or (a=d and b=c) or (a=-d and b=-c.)
If a=0, x=0 and (y=0 or y=1). We have two solutions (0, 0); (0, 1)
If b=0 x=1 and (y=0 or y=1). We have more two solutions (1, 0); (1, 1)
if a=c and b=d x^3=y and x-1=y-1 ==> (-1, -1) is a new solution as x=y and we already have (1, 1) as a solution.
if a=-c and b=-d x^3=-y and x-1= 1-y ==> y^3-6y^2+11y-8=0 so if x is a root x |8 and x= 1or x=-1, or x=2 or x=-2 or x=4 or x=-4 or x=8 or x=-8. For |x|>=4 it is easy to see that |y^3-6y^2+11y-8| >0 so does not work. And it is easy that does not work for x=1 or x=-1 or x=2 or x=-2. So for this case no more integer solutions.
Ifa a=d and b= c ==> x^3=y-1 and y=x-1 ==>x^3-x^2 +2=0 and we do not have integer solutions.
If a=-d and b=-c ==> x^3=-y + 1 and y= 1-x ==> x^3= x. o we have (-1, 2) as a new solution. (1, 0) we already have as a solution.
So (0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (-1, 1) and (-1, 2) are the only integers solutions.

pedrojose
Автор

I just simply took X≥y for which I got all the above 6 order pairs 😎 and this order pairs also includes x<y so no worry for this 2nd inequality.

harshvadher
Автор

that was well done! I think you’re being a little too textbook-like with your solutions. Trying to think of the quickest solutions we get x = y = 1. But if you keep doing it for 1, 0 and -1, you’ll have all solutions, yet it isn’t exhaustive yet. Putting in 2 or -2 doesn’t work out. I think from here on it should be in anyone’s intuition to try to prove that the bounds for x are (-2, 2). Of course x belongs to Z.
And from here on the proof you did and the “notice that...” come much more naturally.

shejin
Автор

It is much simpler in the following way:
x⁴+y=x³+y² --> x⁴-x³=y²-y
x³(x-1)=y(y-1)
x³=y and x-1=y-1 meaning x=y. Hence x³=x --> x(x+1)(x-1)=0
x=(0, -1, 1)=y
x³=y-1 and x-1=y meaning x=y-1-->x³=(y-1)³

nasrullahhusnan