Is Claude Pro Worth It? My Honest Review & Comparison to ChatGPT Plus

This video gives my answer to the question "is Claude Pro worth it?"

Claude Pro costs $20/month and includes the following: higher usage limits, access to Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3 Haiku, projects, priority access during high-traffic, and early access to new features.

Most Popular Videos:

References Mentioned in Video:

#claude #claude3 #claudepro #llms

Time Stamps:
0:00 Intro
1:30 Claude Pro Features
5:20 Comparison to ChatGPT Plus
7:15 Free Alternatives to Claude Pro
9:08 Final Answer
9:47 Outro

Affiliate Disclosure: Some links in the description/pinned comments are sponsored links. If you decide to purchase a paid plan with an AI tool, we may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support my channel. Thank you!

[Leo_ai]

Technically you get less usage on Claude than GPT4o. With OpenAI you are downgraded to 3.5 when you run out of GPT4 messages, in Claude pro I get locked out until my new messages are available. Anthropic need to do something similar.

[Tarantella.Serpentine]

Whats everyone using as a LOCAL Model and UI that's able to use attachments. I've tried Local Web UI with Olama but its crash's like a Stolen Car.

[nyambe]

You don't need to go pro, but some might just no resist the temptation. So much power in your hands

[kaashayee]

I also don’t like paying a company that has the NSA on their board.

[ayaz]

Honestly for me Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 5x better than gpt 4-o, the reason I bought pro is because I already have 3 free account and I always ran out of free usage. It's just too good for writing code.

[michaelburns]

Copilot is at a sophomore level in the foundations of physics. Claude is at a postgraduate level in this subject - conventional vs mathematical integrity.

[cbnewham]

Overall Claude is now a better deal that GPT-4o. I've just cancelled paying for GPT as it seems they will never release AV to all paid users. You can still use GPT-4 for free. Claude's projects are better than what OpenAI custom GPTs provide. The vision capability of Claude is far superior to GPT-4o. If you want graphs you can now do that in Claude. Things have changed in 2 months.

[Arcticwhir]

I will say i've used both at work for quite complex tasks, gpt 4o is quite annoying, many times it outputs code that is the same as before (I asked for changes), Claude is more intuitive, creative, great instruction following and the speed really makes a difference. I have no proof, but its just a feeling 4o overall seems more intelligent, but its personality and instruction following is worse.

Also bing chat is good for simple tasks, would not recommend anyone actually use that if your a heavy chatbot user - its very slow and its obvious they are still using gpt4 or 4 turbo with even more restrictions making the llm less intelligent.

[techkid]

The main reason is usage limits, if you are a dev may be worth it to have both or lean towards claude

[Leo_ai]

Claude can do projects and charts now.

[Definesleepalt]

is there any reasons i would go from GPT to claude when claude doesnt have access to the internet ? from what the LLM says, the training data ends in 2023 so it would be lacking knowledge of certain libraries for programming that have been updated recently or created recently

[piemasta]

You don’t pay to use opus, you pay for more usage of 3.5

[kaashayee]

I cancelled GPT recently. They give free users 4o so I figured why waste money to get the same thing free users get. I’m starting a Claude subscription to use projects. I want to work with my own files.

[HasimFN]

gpt is bad in code even perplexity is better

[cathymartinez]

Why would we even want to have any kind of AI available that is limited to our daily or full usage of? I wouldn't want to pay for something that I don't have to pay for at all

[Fatman]

Keeping Claude Pro for a few months just to show my support for serious competition to ChatGPT, which I also pay for.

I also like to run same queries on both to get a broader view, or have one AI dispute/improve the answer of the other.

[cdmichaelb]

Sorry, didn't watch your video but had to chip in on the title. No. Usage limits are too low on pro. Also lack of other common features. Claud 3.5 is great, but can't use it enough to really get use of it.

[marwentrabelsi]

Claude Pro is bad, accuracy is worst than gpt4, gpt 4 is very buggy web app, no one is perfect

[Spathever]

Dude you're just wrong on many accounts (and I am a ChatGPT Plus user myself as well). Never seeing you again.