The Statue Of Liberty(The true story) Hidden Colors

preview_player
Показать описание
Hidden Colors is a documentary about the real and untold history of people of color around the globe. This film discusses some of the reasons why the contributions of African and aboriginal people have been left out of the pages of history.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

they stole our jazz and call it their own, our rap and call it their own, our fashion style and call it their own.

depitesenate
Автор

At the end of the day, God is Yaweh, Yeshua, the messiah is BLACK!

sbrollins
Автор

There's no hatred in preach the truth. It's only hatred when u lie and going around deceiving people.

testpretty
Автор

Now every Black person needs to be under the radar about what they are doing for the success of there own preservation. Until its time to unite and rebirth are historical heritage. Get your money quietly and self educate themselves on the Real Black history, then come out and teach the young of every Black family the truth.

jaycustom
Автор

This is incorrect. The designer a tented his design in 1838, and it looks the same as the actual sculpture.
The statue is the Roman Libertas, Sol Invictus ("Unconquered Sun"), a goddess of liberty in ancient Rome.

theimmortal
Автор

Its too much of a coincidence, that the white statue would have chains on the foot like the black statue.

suewat
Автор

For the brothers and sisters in doubt of being indigenous here look up Rahm Emmanuel (chicago mayor) moorish proclamation and also go to Google images and type Arnoldus montanus and take a look at how the original natives were portrayed

robinlue
Автор

This Is a fantastic Journey into a Steven King like story, Bazaar and entertaining but total Fantasy.... It's just another form of entertainment. Napoleon said something like, " Never stop a person when they are wrong", or something like that.

rockonbye
Автор

0:44 "But I'm actually black, honest!"

anonb
Автор

The only thing they get along with on the face of the earth is the dog. Man's best friend.

fthcm
Автор

Now the further we go into the future and I understand better.

jamicub
Автор

The Dred Scott Case:
Dred Scott V. John F. A. Sandford U.S. Supreme Court 1857.

This case is a must read for all of you whom identify as Blacks, Negros, Latin, Hispanics, and Afro-Colored-Americans, to gain some comprehension on how you and your Legal Status are viewed in the eyes of the law.

This case was and still is monumental not only in this country but also around the world. For in it the foundations of Status and the Importance of Nationality are revealed.

1.) Dred Scott claimed to be a Negro of African Ancestry and was suing his former slave master for assault while he was a slave to John Sanford. Dred Scott was suing for assault not only himself, but also his wife Harriet, and his two daughters Eliza, and Lizzie.
The courts, first of all, made it known that Dred Scott was a Plaintiff In Error as you will find out why.

2.) The following is quoted from the opening pleas of the case:
"Dred Scott, is not a citizen of the State of Missouri, as alleged in his declaration, because he's a negro of African descent; his ancestors were of pure African blood and were brought into this country and sold as negro slaves, and this the said Sandford is ready to verify."

3.) So off the top, we see that the Supreme Court did not recognize Dred Scott's citizenship, because he claimed to be a "negro of African Decent".

4.) This is important not because the U.S. had no intentions of including negros as protected citizens for the sake of being biased, but because in law, one's Legal Status is the 1st thing taken into consideration.

5.) So when Dred Scott claimed to be a negro from the decent of African slaves, he automatically identified himself as the Property of slave masters.

6.) As we know property does not have the right to sue anything, just like your shoes cannot sue you for wear and tear, because property has no rights.

The Outcome states the following:

7.) "The judgment finding that respondent was not liable to petitioner for assault was reversed and the case was remanded with an order to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction.

8.) The Supreme Court held that petitioner was not a citizen and could not bring the action in the court because petitioner was a Slave of African descent."

9.) Here we see the Supreme Court could not properly rule on the case because it lacked the capacity to do so because of the Status of Dred Scott, which needed to be addressed in the Lower courts of Appeal.

10) The Order of the Court is Status, Jurisdiction, Adjudication, Trial, and then Sentencing. Jurisdiction is the courts Authority of the parties in question or the Subject-Matter at had.

11.) Since Dred Scott lacked proper status as a Citizen, the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter, and at this point, the only thing that can happen is a reversal or a mandate back to the lower courts for them to correct their mistakes.

Quoted from the Lawyers Edition Headnotes:

12.) "Plea in abatement, when may be reviewed - the word "citizen" in the constitution does not embrace one of the negro race - negro cannot become a citizen - slave not made free by residence in a free state of territory - Declaration of Independence does not include slaves as part of the people - the rights and privileges conferred by the Constitution upon citizens do not apply to the negro race - Constitution should have the meaning intended when it was adopted - court may examine other errors in abatement - Constitution expressly affirms right of property in slaves- ."

13.) So here again we see that when you identify yourself as a black, colored, negro form Afro- America you identify yourself as slave property, which has Zero protected rights.

More quotes from the Dred Scott Case:

14.) " The provisions of the Constitution of the United States in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, do not embrace the negro African race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had been or should afterwards be made free in any state."

15.) "The Constitution of the United States does not act upon one of the negro race whenever he shall be free under the laws of a state, and raise him to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen of any other state, and in its own courts."

16.) "The legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as part the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that instrument.

17.) "The enslaved African race was not intended to be included in, and formed no part of, the people who framed and adopted the Declaration of Independence."

18.) So we can plainly see that negro is a class of persons defined as slave property whom shall never be afforded the constitutionally protected rights as a citizen, and neither shall the offspring of those whom call themselves negroes.

19.) Justice H.A. Garland stated the following about all the so-called negroes:

" Now, the following are truths which a knowledge of the history of the world, and particularly of that of our own country, compels us to know - that the African negro race have never been acknowledged as belonging to the family of nations; that as amongst them there never has been known or recognized by the inhabitants of other countries anything partaking of the character of Nationality or civil or political polity; that this race has been by all the nations of Europe regarded as subjects of capture or purchase; as subjects of commerce or traffic; and that introduction of that race into every section of this country was not as members of civil or political society, but as slaves, as property in the strictest sense of the term."

20.) Here we see the Supreme Court Justice made the correct decision, which was not based out of racism as some may suppose but based on the fact that there is no Negroland, there is no Negro Flag, there is no Negro Constitution or Embassy of the Negros, so without the components that would show that this so-called negro exist as a nation of people, the courts are not bound to recognize a person or people whom call themselves something that has never existed in history, and has no known historical origins.

21.) This applies to African, because Africa is a Continent, with many Nations. Black, Afro-American, and Colored also fall under the same categories of a Stateless person or those whom have no known nationality.

22.) Being a black, colored, negro, from Afro-America puts you outside of the human family of nations. It's not a racist thing, it's just a fact of law.

23.) When you run around here with the socialized mis-conditioning that you are a negro, black, colored, from Afro-America you are telling the world that you are a renegade pirate, because you have no known Nationality, which means you have no Family or origin, which means you have no In-laws, which means that you are an Outlaw, and are operating Outside of the Law.

24.) This is the reason why the poor negro has the problems he/she experiences in his/her own land, because the so-called negro has refused to "Honor his father and Mother, by proclaiming his/her nationality as a Moorish American that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest live long on the earth", as stated in the 1st of the 10 commandments.

25.) Keep in mind that due to how big this case is the legislation decided to capitalize this concept even further through the introduction of the 14th Amendment, which passed Corporate citizenship to all of those whom choose to operate outside of their nationality.

26.) The Remedy and Recourse for all of this is to Proclaim your Nationality as a Moorish American, return to the Culture and Customs of your Ancient Foremothers and Forefathers right here in America, correct your Legal Status, then your birthrights protected by the U.S. Constitution can be enforced, because you have changed your status from a dead, Corporate entity, to a living breathing Natural Person, whom is part of a body politic, and a Nation, whom the laws are afforded to, and are recognized around the world.

Cease from identifying as Negro, Black, Colored, African-American as these are Slave Chains that will Forever keep you and your people in Legal Voluntary Slavery. Don't allow anyone to identify you as one of the 14th Amendment voluntary slave brands.

Islam

You must proclaim your Nationality Moors!

Peace and Love!

ChefAnatoly
Автор

wow thanks for the truth. I never knew that

frankize
Автор

Wow. I didn't know that. Interesting

TakeCareRihanna
Автор

Yes! I heard this years ago! Hadn’t heard it since smh

laurenkeyes
Автор

So basically what you're telling me is that you are so great, that you allowed yourself to be exploited and you actually came up with everything on earth while in

JamisonRicardo
Автор

Other cultures loved Africa and the people of. They had no problems with us.

msdm
Автор

Unfortunately they was wrong the statue at St. Martin was built in 2007

EarthZepTepi
Автор

This is completely false, just check out snopes' article on the statue of liberty.

Doazic
Автор

Reparations!!!! We want the original design back.

ishaspeaks