Rep. Jim Jordan questions Matthew Whitaker

preview_player
Показать описание
Rep. Jim Jordan questions Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker at a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Whitaker said that he has "not interfered in any way" in the special counsel's Russia investigation as he faced a contentious and partisan congressional hearing in his waning days on the job.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

After watching this I have to say WE NEED TERM LIMITS!!! ASAP

pilarg
Автор

The question is why Jim Jordan still in Congress?

hectorlandaverde
Автор

By not answering, he answered your question congressman Jordan

JR-playlists
Автор

When God was passing out heads, Matt Whittiker thought He said beds and asked for a king-size. Lol.!

jamesgregory
Автор

Oh...Jordan is getting so excited. He’s getting nervous, he really wants to ask...”Who are these people? Am I one of them?” At last that’s my take away from that performance.

goldieh
Автор

I really hate the way politicians on these committees attack the other side. Can you guys just work for the American people and drop your party’s mentality and bias after the other side.

frolege
Автор

Whitaker sounds like a kid trying to use as many words as possible to fill up that 500 word essay

thatfunk
Автор

"In my experience with investigations generally"..._he's been inside a courtroom as a lawyer *in only 10 trials and lead council in only 1 with several lawyers.* Yet he is somehow the acting attorney general of the United States....

jerrellbevers
Автор

No you do not release the names of people you are investigating. One reason is that, being investigated is not the same as being charged, it's not even the same as being accused, so you have to protect the identities of these people, lest you violate their civil rights and thereby invalidate the investigation should charges be brought and the case thrown out of court. Stupid question.

dropforgedrats
Автор

I can’t understand how, with all this there’re still 47% of the country that doesn’t see what’s happening

beeejayy
Автор

At least Whitaker had the guts to stand up to Jordan. "Jimmy 'two-faced' Jordan" couldn't understand that Whitaker was doing the GOP a favor... by keeping his mouth shut about which individual's names were redacted.

emancify
Автор

I like this Whitaker guy. Can we make him the AG?

markhansen
Автор

Jim Jordan for President 2024-2028!!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

mlvcustomsllc
Автор

This politics is way beyond what Whitaker intelligence, capacity and capabilities to manage.

GlobalPenguin
Автор

Welp, he's guilty, who's next

mrwitda
Автор

I wonder if he was a better hot tub salesman than Attorney General?

politegangsta
Автор

These meetings should be held like a court of law. Yes Sir, No Sir. Period.

honeypie
Автор

lol the crooks dont even know whats happening here.. lol jordan and whitaker are hilarious awesome job guys

steverinogateserelli
Автор

the investigation needs to be investigated. Not answering those simple questions - its very likely that Whitaker tries to not give false testimony at the same time avoiding to accuse himself.

kaptnwelpe
Автор

The way Congressman Jordan says “memo.”😂

dndnenejeeehehehe