THIS Got Through Peer Review?!

preview_player
Показать описание

Follow me:
Behavioral Science Instagram: @petejudoofficial
Instagram: @petejudo
Twitter: @petejudo
LinkedIn: Peter Judodihardjo

Good tools I actually use:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I saw a paper that had the words: “as I am an AI language model” in its conclusion.

Nice going Elsevier.

nyx
Автор

I took a look at the "apology" from Frontiers. They noted that one of the reviewers raised concerns about the images being AI generated, yet the authors never responded. Then Frontiers "failed to act on the lack of author compliance with the reviewers' requirements", and they're looking into how this happened. I think we all know how this happened.

seanrrr
Автор

The horngus of a dongfish is attached by a scungle to a kind of dillsack (the nutte sac), 77)

seanh
Автор

I've been trying and failing to get a legitimate paper on legitimate research with legitimate text published since 2020. The fact that some people can just skate through peer review with zero scrutiny really grinds my gears.

ivacheung
Автор

I so vividly wish we could know the peers who reviewed this 😆😂

tayzonday
Автор

The untold problem is, that all these people doing bad science are often rewarded for it by the system, because they can produce more sh** papers and that is what counts nowadays. Doing slow but good science does not pay off.

scepticalchymist
Автор

What we learned: When your paper gets rejected from 10 good journals, just send that garbage to Frontier. Frontier prints all the garbage without any of the peer review as it looks like.

brootalbap
Автор

Speaking as someone that has published in Frontiers: It's a garbage publisher. You can't take it seriously, or at the very least, be very sceptical.

krazoe
Автор

My wife is a scientist who does peer review. She's very dedicated about it and it's given her ideas. Mostly that 'this paper is bs and now I can do a study that shows this study, which I won't be able to stop, is wrong and I will get a good paper out of it.' That's 3x now. Though I have noticed nobody has asked to peer review in about 5 years...

Draconisrex
Автор

This is exactly why I take all peer review requests and WORK HARD on those projects, just because I believe in my discipline and want good scholarship to continue. The last paper I reviewed, I couldn't keep your channel out of my mind as I checked everything as carefully as possible.

JapanPop
Автор

Science takes yet another massive L. As a scientist I am once again hanging my head. What a joke peer review has become.

jerrycaughman
Автор

A lot of people don't understand how ChatGPT style language models work; they think it actually knows and comprehends what it's talking about.

robertlewis
Автор

As a Leregasaur, I remember the resprouization process. It was terrifying.

NightmareCourtPictures
Автор

It's not peer-review which is the problem, it's the editors of the journals. It happens so often that the reviewers raise concerns but editors of certain journals just do not care. For them it's the number of papers at the end of the year, not their quality

jaykay
Автор

100K to publish in nature, and not 1 single $ goes to the peer reviewers

SoiBoi_Kelda
Автор

Frontiers is not a respected journal....but your point and the problem still stands.

jgmor
Автор

The whole integrity issue of "studies" has been questionable from the start. A "Study" of the effects of Olubolu extract shows mice live much longer than the control group given a placebo. They don't mention that the control group of mice where twice as old at the start of the study.

thomcarr
Автор

AI generated Squirrel With Massive Balls was not what I was expecting on youtube.

akam
Автор

I love how I was telling people ten years ago that peer review is flawed and should not be looked at as the authority of reliable information, was told I was wrong by just about everyone, and now this view is becoming more widely accepted rapidly right now.

nessunolinux
Автор

A resident used ChatGPT for the lit review chapter in their thesis. The examiners took a look at the reference list and found out that they were entirely hallucinated. Don't need to be an oracle to know what happened next 😂

Daris_TH
join shbcf.ru