Is Your English Good? Answer This!

#shorts #englishspeaking #english #learnenglish

[Nava]

In English, pronouns usually refer to their closest preceding noun. In this sentence, "daughter" is the closest noun to "she".

[AliMustaqim-uqjt]

The daughter was drunk.

Explanation: The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" uses "she" to refer to the most recent female subject mentioned, which in this case is the daughter. Therefore, the daughter was the one who was drunk, leading to the mother beating her up.

[ALTERRAa]

In the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk, " the pronoun "she" is ambiguous and can refer to either the mother or the daughter. Without additional context, it's not clear who was drunk.

To clarify the situation:

- If the mother was drunk and beat up her daughter, the sentence could be rephrased as: "A mother, who was drunk, beat up her daughter."
- If the daughter was drunk and was beaten up by her mother, the sentence could be rephrased as: "A mother beat up her daughter because the daughter was drunk."

Without further context, both interpretations are possible.

[Ronydafa]

General rule of thumb for personal pronouns (he, she, it, etc.) is that they refer to the last noun used. So in this case, we would infer that it was the daughter who was drunk, because she was mentioned last.

[ericvigen]

This is why any language should be clear & concise to convey the succinct meanings.

[Dark_]

In the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk, " the pronoun "she" could refer to either the mother or the daughter, making the sentence ambiguous. However, in most cases, it's assumed that "she" refers to the daughter, as the mother is reacting to the daughter's behavior. To clarify who was drunk, the sentence would need to be rephrased explicitly.

[Herioc_Rimuru]

In the sentence, "A mother beats her daughter because she was drunk, " the pronoun "she" is ambiguous. Generally, "she" refers to the nearest preceding noun. In this case, "she" most likely refers to the mother.

So, it means that the mother was drunk and beat her daughter.

However, to make the context clear, the sentence should be more specific. For example, "A mother, who was drunk, beat her daughter, " or "A mother beat her daughter because her daughter was drunk."

Source : ChatGPT

[caesargk]

In the sentence provided, the phrase "because she was drunk" follows "the daughter." Therefore, according to the structure of the sentence, it suggests that the daughter is the one who was drunk.

[S.s.user-mmzppjj]

Her daughter of course .
Your videos are so funny, important and different 💚

[Abinayavenkat]

Here "because" is the conjunction connecting the two sentences... In the second sentence "she" is the pronoun used to describe the noun in the 1st sentence which is actually mother...

[EmranHosain-xb]

We have the same dilemma in colloquial Arabic, but in classical Arabic there is a sign that shows who is the subject and who is the object.

[Vegitow]

The daughter was drunk
Explanation:in the sentence, the mother "Beats" the daughter so it means it's in the present ;
because she "was drunk" it's in the past so it means the daughter was drunk
Better explanation :
We have 2 options :1)the mother beats up her daughter because the mother is drunk
2)the mother beats up her daughter cuz her daughter was drunk
As u can see only one option match with the sentence and it's the 2nd one
Cuz

[amazingvideoswithyasser]

In Syntax, we call this as a case of ambiguity which carries two possibilities.

[md.zillurrahman]

From my perspective, the mother was drunk. Because a drunk person can only beat someone without any apprehension or, the answer can also be the daughter. Because a mother can beat her daughter if the daughter is drunk(addicted to alcohol). 😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤

[NaeemFaris]

Based on the sentence structure and context, it appears that the daughter was drunk. The sentence states "because she was drunk", and "she" typically refers to the daughter in this context. However, without additional clarification or context, it's possible that the sentence could be interpreted in different ways.

[jenalenebosque]

This question is tricky
The sentence is implying that the mother was drunk.

It's important to recognize that this is a very serious situation. Domestic violence is never acceptable, and it's crucial to seek help if you or someone you know is experiencing this.

Here's why the sentence is misleading:

- It focuses on the daughter's action (being drunk) as the cause of the mother's violence. This is a common tactic used by abusers to shift blame and minimize their own actions.
- It doesn't provide context. We don't know the full story or the history of this relationship, which makes it impossible to determine the truth without more information.


But i also think that it's mostly likely to be the daughter cuz "she" was used in the sentence means that it is the most recent female character.

[wijdan]

The polite, optimistic teacher, God bless you 🙏

[fadwafadwa]

Without more context, we can t definitely say who was drunk. The 2 interpretations are possible

[nicdunz]

In the sentence "a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk, " the pronoun "she" can refer to either the mother or the daughter, making it ambiguous. However, in many cases, such sentences imply that the person who committed the action (the mother in this case) is the one being described, suggesting the mother was drunk. But without additional context, the exact person who was drunk cannot be determined definitively.

[mahirgamer]

Ans. The daughter was drunk

Explanation:- The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk", uses 'she' to refer to the most recent subject mentioned, which in this case is 'daughter'. Therefore, the daughter was the one who was drunk, leading to the mother beating her up.