Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 1: Complete Diversity Requirement)

📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE

Download here: link coming soon.

📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP

🤝 CONNECT WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR

❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS

📱 TECH

📣 ABOUT

Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more—Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.

🎬 VIDEO INFO

Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 1: Complete Diversity Requirement)

00:00 Introduction
00:09 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
00:35 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
01:21 Diversity Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332
04:26 Practice Problem 1.0
10:47 Practice Problem 1.1
13:57 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
15:55 Timing Issues in the Diversity Analysis
18:56 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1)
22:18 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2)
25:00 Practice Problem 2.0
27:23 Practice Problem 2.1
29:16 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(3)
30:20 Practice Problem 3.0
35:52 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(4)
36:59 Determining Citizenship of the Parties
38:20 Determining Citizenship: Individuals ("Natural Persons")
41:07 Determining Citizenship: Corporations
42:05 "Nerve Center" Test (Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010))
44:57 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 1)
47:56 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 2)
50:40 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 3)
53:01 Determining Citizenship: Unincorporated Associations
54:38 Determining Citizenship: Class Actions
55:47 Practice Problem 5.0
1:00:03 Conclusion

Primary sources of law for this video:

See U.S. Const. art. III, § 2; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1332, 1367.
See U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1; International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).
See 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
See Belleville Catering v. Champaign Market Place, 350 F.3d 691 (7th Cir. 2003); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729 (7th Cir. 1998).
Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010).

[jalasky]

I thought I lacked the ability to comprehend and understand my prof until I watched your video. Thanks for restoring my confidence.

[andrearosario]

You don't know the service you are doing to lost law school students! Thank you!!

[MiamiSun]

Suppose, P from NY for example, moved to a foreign state permanently, returns to visit family in NY and wishes to sue a NY resident, could diversity jurisdiction be applicable or would their most previous US domicile remain relevant as they are an American citizen? Does their foreign domicile mean they are treated as a foreign citizen for jurisdictional purposes? Would it be different if they still had a NY address or US bank account?

[sheillahmengesa]

Thank you very much, you made this so easy for me.

[pamscasa]

It is broken down so well that I actually get it. Hopefully, it will click in order to write out essays.

[zarayan]

Thank you! Can you please add a Professional Responsibility course to Leap?

[RonaldCarlson-se]

Who is the attorney in the video as I have a big judgement and I need to speak to him

[jeffh.]

At 22:02, this video conflicts with your video "How to Analyze Diversity Jurisdiction on a Civil Procedure Essay" at 8:30. Am I missing something?

[SpenderDebby-xn]

Clark Matthew Smith Brenda Harris Patricia

[RonaldCarlson-se]

Who is the attorney in the video as I have a big judgement and I need to speak to him

[RonaldCarlson-se]

Who is the attorney in the video as I have a big judgement and I need to speak to him