Hamza Tzortzis confronts Richard Dawkins

Lawrence Krauss vs Hamza Tzortzis - Islam vs Atheism Debate

[medzykh]

I would love to see Hamza and Dawkins having an actual debate and discussing the whole creator/atheist issue in front a a crowd.

[simplyhuman]

He didn’t really “confront him”. He spoke to him. Not everything has to be a clash

[joshr.]

If you catch someone on the street like that with no sense of thier scedule, its not that he is "running off" Its more likely he has more important things to do than reiterate information he has given in actual debates, as well as his book, .

[ggcctv]

Richard Dawkins did not “run off” - he graciously waited and answered scattered, irrelevant, imbecilic questions from someone who had barely heard of evolution! He spent about 3mins more with this person than he needed to 🙏

[differentangle]

As a muslim, I think the last comment at the end of the video was very unnecessary.

[Add_Account]

That was a very respectful interview..

[sheshan]

Dawkins was busy going somewhere and hamza stopped him in the middle of public place and started asking question he already answered many times. If Hamza really wants to know answer he can book a ticket to his lecture and ask question in his lecture. If you watch the remaining part of the video hamza did samething to the person interrupt him.

[bionecktide]

You failed, don't think you won by writing he ran off. He destroyed your argument years ago.

[stephenrandell]

I don't blame him for " running off", think he's just sick of answering dumb questions !👍

[firebladerr]

You actually think he ran off because he couldn’t answer your questions... rather than he had more important things to do... he gives good answers and you finish by giving quotes from a mythical book....

[kylef]

I like how he can’t believe in evolution, but pulls quantum mechanics and physics in and acts like he understands them. Lol

[arthurmorgan]

Hamza asked for evidence. And Charles just started talking evidence rather than proving it
i'm starting to think about reverting

[Faiizy]

just to put it there, Hamza said 'thank you Richard take care' the last comment is not from him

[moi]

Wallahi, wallahi .Richard Dawkin is incapable of debating hamza.
Just see the other debates of Hamza

[paulmartin]

It’s clear he didn’t look for an opportunity to run off, you’ve revealed your own bias against him in your statement.

It looked more like he was engaged in a chat whilst he was going into, and coming out of a hotel, and used a natural break to dip out and carry on with what he was doing before he had been asked questions on mic. Like we all would.

[tanvirshaikh]

I am a Muslim. But man! Dawkins is such a gentleman. I pray for his hidaya.

[Sbazz]

To explain something incredibly complex in a simple way vs explaining something incredibly simple in a complex way is the different here. Dawkins is so firm in his understanding he doesn’t have to hide it with strange words like “non complimentary paradigm” and show that he can remember book pages.

[openmind]

Mr Tzortis: "a non-complimentary paradigm ..." He just uses big words to try to confuse an issue (which probably works with his usual audience) because the point being made isn't strong. It's easy to see Professor Dawkins looking bemused. LOL

[emirozdemir]

those last quotes are the reason why people dont take you seriously

[albert]

Richard gave you (Hamza) almost 5 minutes of his time to discuss these matters, he gave thoughtful answers and listened to your points and you have the nerve to say "he ran off"