3M Cold Shrink vs Heat Shrink

preview_player
Показать описание
3M™ Cold Shrink Pre Stretched Tubes are compared to a heat shrink tube application.

Features at a glance:

-Provides constant radial pressure & seal without adhesive
-Allows for expansion and contraction after installation
-Simple & fast installation (no tools or heat required)
-Quality long term reliability
-Available in EPDM rubber and silicone
-Possible applications include electrical installation, cable repair, mechanical protection and moisture barriers

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

3M >>> Always in vanguard!
I'm respondable to study the Market and By introduction do PRÉ STRETCHING TUBE in the Brasilian Market About 30/35 years ago! Absolut success until now!
( Sidnei Leite de Siqueira )

sidneisiqueira
Автор

Lol if the guy using the torch actually had it on the right setting and used it properly he would be done in 4-5 seconds, 3M just being stupid now

Shazzkid
Автор

I still go with the heat shrink - mechanically better. All you did here was show that a cold shrink can be put on a few seconds faster.

TptCoy
Автор

Should use blue flame, for fast curing

feelvlog
Автор

This was a joke. That heat shrink could have been applied in half the time and with high quality.

TurreTuntematon
Автор

I'll just leave the one comment actually pointing out that there are specific applications, areas or atmospheres where you can't use an open flame without risk of injury or damage to property.
The comparison here is mostly for final result. The timer was indeed useless, but the product looked sound.

Highly likely for the product to not be for personal use. Think more industrial applications.

KaffiRawr
Автор

Deceiving advertising, let me show you how to do the heat sink in 20 seconds tops

dkaloupis
Автор

Never been impressed with 3M  adhesive tapes applied to LED tape runs either, hopeless adhesive qualities!

catsarereallyfurryaliens
Автор

How tedious though. And all that plastic waste. Meh.

briannordin