FOX-3s Are Here!! And AMRAAM Sucks...

🔴 * Join The Habibi Party! *

And as CJ says, Ah shoot... here we go again! ( I like this saying so imma keep it at this point xD )

War Thunder's Fox 3 testing is here and missiles are amazing!! except for the AMRAAM which to be honest sucks! but i talk about the R77, Aim120, R-Darter and PL-8, I left out the mica missile since it doesnt thrust vector for now.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

🎵 Tracklist:
moonboy - popcorn
Hicks - Pumpkin
Tama - Taiyaki
moonboy - candy
Hicks - First Floor
flwrz - bedtime stories
Tama - Clouds
ARISU - UENO
moonboy - stay with me
Hicks - Milk
moonboy - pocky sticks
flwrz - paper planes
ARISU - Digital Monsters
Hicks - Fiji
Tama - Vanilla Sky
kyu - friendship
Tama - Coffee
moonboy - seconds
ARISU - Watermelon
Hicks - Memories
moonboy - butter
Tama - Initium
Hicks - Sweet Pleasure
moonboy - tides
Tama - Sweet Morning
Hicks - Whiskey on Ice
moonboy - iced coffee
Hicks - Beach Sunset
Tama - Starlit Path
ARISU - Origami
flwrz - out of time
Repeat Playlist

[galacticdragon]

Something to note: this test event is most definitely not meant to be balanced and also as you’ve said, subject to change. Everyone is talking about different fox-3s like they are so bad or what ever as if they are going to be added this update in its current state and people should really just relax about it.

[batlax]

I wouldn’t say the AMRAAM sucks. It just doesn’t, it’ll pull probably 10 more Gs than the Sparrow, a SIGNIFICANTLY better seekerhead, it’s active obviously, it accelerates much faster too. In BVR, it’ll be interesting to see how it plays out against the ER, but closer range, it’ll be better, because you don’t have to maintain a lock. And it’s, again, all up to change, and most the Fox 3s stats are placeholder rn anyways. The moral of the story, we need 8v8

[cristalhalo]

Well technically the micaER is the best missile outhere

[Registered_Simp]

I mean, none of the seekers are anywhere near finished, which is what the crux of the issue is for their effectiveness. All of these should be as hard, if not harder to notch than an R-27ER. All the doppler gates are currently as wide as Aim-54. While they may not have as much kinetic range as ER, the Fox-3 aspect allows you to get a little riskier in BVR with your usage since you can just notch of go cold for safety while your missile keeps going. Gives you first shot at re-commit too if you time it right. That paired with the crazy agility of all these missiles (Holy fin angle...) gives me hope that these missiles will be VERY good once polished. A properly modeled Aim-120A/B, R-77, or anything else here would be nothing short of monstrous in good hands.

[ReviveHF]

PL12 sucks too. People already complaint about this issues but they turn a deaf ears against players.

[heinrickthunder]

Never got a chance to check it out but will the mig-29g and su-27 get the r77?

[Elbereth_TV]

derby andd R darter are identical statswise

[zenki_ls]

what do you think about the R-27EA? it is the same as a ER but with a ARH seeker head which may be the same as the R-77s seeker but i may be wrong but id argue the AIM-120 will just be a upgrade that is much needed to replace the Sparrow because i hate having my AIM-7 just go on its own little side quest into a cloud and then disappear...

[fqeagles]

Who coul've guessed hamraam would have sucked 😂😂😂 usual Gaijin

[Theratsnatcher]

1:14 idk about long range but the aim120 doesn't suck at close range its way better than clocking at 3600km/h aim7m is 2800km close to 27er 4400km/h in 5km to 8km shot and really that's what you want to be in to beat players the only fox3 to get to 4000km/h is the mica em
to think that you can shot mica em vs 27rt at 10km range and win/ trade is really big up from the winky r530d

[willthomas]

Yeah bro everyone get their own opinion but I pretty much disagree with you across the board. You take your r27er and I will use an amraam and I will win 9 in 10 times. It’s all down to knowing how

[SirMikato]

i just read the titel and i had the best experience with the aamram like they where the consitant missles if played (this comment will change maybe after the i watched the vid)

[Boris_The_Turtle]

I mean the stats aren’t really meant to be super accurate and tuned correctly. They are all just placeholder.

[theflyinggasmask]

Well, it's neither an AIM-120B or C

[Julio_Tortillia]

I mean most of the missile shots in this video were total ass so no wonder they didnt go well. You didnt use TWS at all, basically negating the no RWR lock ability of fox-3s, you launched at cold targets 7-15 km away and didnt really try to use the ARH, you just used it as a sparrow.

No wonder you think its ass.

[SlipKnot]

pretty funny you're comparing missiles which don't even have complete models or set stats and might as well not even exist yet because they literally don't yet in WT. You might as well be comparing the new Pixie Dust Hypersonic Fart Cannon vs. the Hydro-Electric Railgun and Radome targeting system they copy pasted from Metal Gear Solid...

[gialby]

Did he spelled the word AMRAAM wrong in both the tittle and minitaure

[salamaahmedbalash]

isntreal ? how dare u 😂 with thunbergs face ok 👌 👌

[Em_Youl]

2:14 Did you mean to say R-77? And are you sure with mach

[atlasrowe]

Would be better if you stopped using them like aim7s.

Literally every one of these your flying in a straight line and holding lock.

TIP: TWS fire and forget.