filmov
tv
Writing the NIH Research (R01) grant: Strategies for Success
Показать описание
Presented By:
Christopher C. Dant, PhD - Consultant, Medcom Consulting
Speaker Biography:
Dr. Christopher Dant is a PhD-trained investigator and consultant in the biomedical field. Early in his career, he was an investigator at high-performance laboratories at Indiana University, University of Michigan, and Stanford Medical School. Early in his postgraduate career, he apprenticed with a Senior Editor at JAMA and became as a Principal Scientist at NASA's Life Sciences Division and Department of Energy, where he worked with investigators to obtain federal grants and to write successful manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals.
Webinar:
Writing the NIH Research (R01) grant: Strategies for Success
Webinar Abstract:
With highly competitive NIH budgets and ever-increasing restrictions on federal spending, getting noticed and winning an NIH R grant is far more difficult and highly competitive than it has ever been. To be competitive today, new and inexperienced grant writers must learn the essentials of strong grantsmanship that is rarely taught today in academia.
In 2018, the overall success rate for NIH R01 grants was just 20%, with some Institutes approving only 10% of submitted applications. This means that NIH-wide, nearly 8 out of 10 R01 application submissions are rejected. If you want to be one of the PIs that receives research grant funding, you must be able to write your grant so that it prevails over the five review criteria which generates your overall impact score.
Many investigators, especially new investigators, don’t know how to write a winning grant or understand what pitfalls to avoid. Writing a winning grant proposal that gets noticed by reviewers requires that investigators produce a highly polished, cohesive grant that really knocks it out of the park for its significance, innovation, and approach while showing that it will have a major impact on their field. In this webinar, Dr. Dant will provide you with details of what reviewers want and don’t want to see in your R01 grant proposal. Ultimately, you’ll learn how to write your next R01 grant in a way that will get reviewer’s attention and influence them to approve and fund your research proposal.
Earn PACE Credits:
LabRoots on Social:
SnapChat: labroots_inc
Christopher C. Dant, PhD - Consultant, Medcom Consulting
Speaker Biography:
Dr. Christopher Dant is a PhD-trained investigator and consultant in the biomedical field. Early in his career, he was an investigator at high-performance laboratories at Indiana University, University of Michigan, and Stanford Medical School. Early in his postgraduate career, he apprenticed with a Senior Editor at JAMA and became as a Principal Scientist at NASA's Life Sciences Division and Department of Energy, where he worked with investigators to obtain federal grants and to write successful manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals.
Webinar:
Writing the NIH Research (R01) grant: Strategies for Success
Webinar Abstract:
With highly competitive NIH budgets and ever-increasing restrictions on federal spending, getting noticed and winning an NIH R grant is far more difficult and highly competitive than it has ever been. To be competitive today, new and inexperienced grant writers must learn the essentials of strong grantsmanship that is rarely taught today in academia.
In 2018, the overall success rate for NIH R01 grants was just 20%, with some Institutes approving only 10% of submitted applications. This means that NIH-wide, nearly 8 out of 10 R01 application submissions are rejected. If you want to be one of the PIs that receives research grant funding, you must be able to write your grant so that it prevails over the five review criteria which generates your overall impact score.
Many investigators, especially new investigators, don’t know how to write a winning grant or understand what pitfalls to avoid. Writing a winning grant proposal that gets noticed by reviewers requires that investigators produce a highly polished, cohesive grant that really knocks it out of the park for its significance, innovation, and approach while showing that it will have a major impact on their field. In this webinar, Dr. Dant will provide you with details of what reviewers want and don’t want to see in your R01 grant proposal. Ultimately, you’ll learn how to write your next R01 grant in a way that will get reviewer’s attention and influence them to approve and fund your research proposal.
Earn PACE Credits:
LabRoots on Social:
SnapChat: labroots_inc
1:40:48
Writing the NIH Research (R01) grant: Strategies for Success
0:09:36
How to Use the NIH R01 Grant Review Criteria to Write Your Application
0:09:02
How to create an efficient writing plan for your first NIH R01
0:11:15
Essential tips for writing an effective NIH R01 Aims page
0:07:25
NIH R01, R35, R03, or R21: which one should I apply for?
0:08:26
How to use your K Award to write a fundable NIH R01
0:10:39
Improve your NIH R01 score with effective use of preliminary data
0:42:41
NIH R01s Research Plan
0:03:28
How to Get a Great Impact Score on Your NIH R01
0:12:59
How To Write A Winning NIH R01 Grant: 5 Key Planning Tips
0:09:03
How to use a system to write a competitive NIH R01 grant
0:00:41
When is the best time to start writing your first NIH R01?
0:00:33
Focus on this when you're writing your very first NIH R01 grant
0:05:01
How to Make a Writing Plan for Your NIH R01
0:12:14
How to tell if your NIH R01 research ideas are competitive enough
0:00:44
1 of my biggest pieces of advice for writing your R01 grant
0:00:48
Resubmitting your R01
0:00:30
Here's how the R01 grant funding process works
0:07:50
How to Use Preliminary Data in Your NIH R01 Grant Applications
0:04:44
5 Keys to Writing a Successful NIH R01
0:07:46
Why preliminary data is essential for successful NIH R01 grant applications
0:04:21
3 Mistakes That Will Ruin Your NIH R01
0:00:34
How should you organize your 12-page Research Strategy in your R01?
0:11:34
5 tips to write stronger specific aims for your NIH R01 grant
Комментарии