Attribution Theories: Part 1 (Learn Social Psychology Fundamentals)

preview_player
Показать описание


Please subscribe to the channel and leave a comment below!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Note: At 3:11 (ish), it should say "situational attribution" in the lower right corner instead of "dispositional attribution."

AndyLuttrellPsych
Автор

I don’t understand why you don’t have more views. Your videos are excellent and could teach a lot of people about social psychology. You might wanna put the words social psychology at the beginning of the title of each video so that your videos show up when people search the word psychology, just a suggestion.

unclebaya
Автор

Sir please make a video on Kellys theory of attribution

saifnurie
Автор

Your video is such a big help for me to understand our lesson. Thank you very much!

kraine_xoxo
Автор

Great video, made easy to understand. In one of the early slides you forgot to change dispositional to situational, its fine though as you say situational, still may confuse people completely new to Psychology.

louisbrown
Автор

Thanks for helping
- A student from India

sanskarsinha
Автор

what is the major attributes transmitted amoung the youth trought social media?

asokasamarajeewa
Автор

Excellent explanation... Watching from India because exam is near... 😂

socialistcomrade
Автор

What is the self serving nature of attributions

KemigaboDorothy
Автор

Thank you so much! You have saved my essay.

yeetyeet
Автор

Please, is there a difference between attributional Theory and correspondance Bias?

Vivldi
Автор

Thank you for making this informative video!

casperthcerb
Автор

For clarification purposes, I'm assuming the first example for situational should've said situational and not dispositional

kayimanimrie
Автор

this is her. this is the best psychologist ever

rafaelvieira
Автор


Why is it the case that the reader should assume 50/50 for the likelihood that the author likes/hates Castro? Sure the author does not have a choice as to where or not to write for/against Castro. But still, even if they are forced to write against; wouldn't the conviction/arguments of the arguments made give us insight into his/her disposition? i.e. if someone were to be writing against their will, the arguments they make could/would be not as strong as the arguments made if they believed it?

acube
Автор

Me watching from Uganda, , , , because I have a presentation tomorrow 😂😂😂😂

KemigaboDorothy
Автор

If the emphasis is placed more on what do you think the answer actually is, instead of what is the actual answer, whilst trying to explained a perceived behavior, hen  how are people expected to take any of this seriously? Do you wonder why peope studying other STEM degrees are saying "psychology and what not is where the stupid people go to study"?

TheBengalDragon