Jim Cramer talks Nvidia's partnerships and how they can offer up new investing ideas

'Mad Money' host Jim Cramer talks what Nvidia's partnerships could mean for the investing landscape and your portfolio.

[kortyEdna]

I agree that many people are considering NVDA as the "Stock of the year." However, I'm curious about which stocks could potentially become the next META in terms of growth over the next decade. I've allocated $200k for investment, aiming to retire comfortably.

[rickgraham]

The licensing agreement might not allow SSTK to use their user's images in that way.

[oleglynch]

Set Shorts for that small caps recommended - looks like they have months of existence as market cap is small to survive kiss of death! Curious if that video stay after they fill buncrupties!

[thetickerguy]

The medical and image stock photo companies are interesting companies to consider, as well as all the companies that build servers, like SuperMicro and provide memory like Micron, and others, as a part of this AI revolution.

[GMThePeople]

"Jim Cramer" is an anagram for "Mr. Mice Jar". o/

[intercityrailpal]

Fly? I get bedrooms on Amtrak's name trains! Total comfort! Bed shower your own bathroom.

[slytherben]

This guy predicted a complete market collapse less than 10 days ago. Don't make investment decisions based on CNBC analysts

[JamesArthur-qzfm]

Jim see if you can get Mr Wonderful to bail out the stable genius is good for it

[richschmitz]

poor Jim has 24 migraines a month and gives about 400 headaches a month to his opponents -- booyah

[rocketscience]

Investing in Getty Images has got to be the worst idea in the history of Mad Money (which is saying a lot). Why would anyone spend any money buying images from Getty Images if AI is supposedly so great that you can create any image you want in 2 seconds? NVDA has great revenue growth which is already mostly priced into its current stock price. Cramer is projecting those revenues to infinity. I'm not sure when, but at some point this is not going to end well for NVDA investors. It never does.

[shephusted]

i cite the cramer inverse trading law here - totally irrational exuberance - instead look for the companies who will overthrow the king - they have room to run #quant fight jim likes to highlight companies and this is totally wrong - instead of being an investor like jim and warren be more like jim and trade sectors that are secular gainers with an index fund like approach to lower risk exposure and make more consistent gains - jim's 'knowledge' is frequently wrong - you need numbers based horse sense, not sentiment.