The Reality Principle of the CTMU is a Requirement for any Theory of Everything

Part 1 of the series "Learning the CTMU". Themes include self-containment, universal sets, models, theories, laws, self-processing and binary logic.
#CTMU #RealityTheory #epistemology #theoryofeverything #universe #ontology

[JamesWelch-mrfu]

CTMUist: Thank you very much for being so generous as to provide this elucidation of the Reality Principle. I wasn't even aware how much I didn't "see." I am hopeful that you will provide additional videos elucidating the other two tautologies which compose the CTMU supertautology, namely 2) the principle of linguistic reducibility, and 3)The principle of Syndiffeonesis. Thank you very much for all you do.

[PersonPerson]

Thank you for this great explanation. This is great work and helps me fill out many of the nooks and crannies of both formal academic and CTMU-related understanding that I was missing while reading Langan's papers. Your channel is amazing and thanks for the work.

[markobolka]

truly
you grasp his theory
very well.

this has been most edifying. i hope you persevere and i encourage you.

thank you!!

[MikeFuller-okok]

3:30 Outside reality is merely knowing what reality is, and knowing what outside is.

[philosophy]

I feel like I follow to the end, but I don't understand the statement "If it [a model] has internal contradictions, the model of ctmu will expose and resolve this.". Is there an example of model with such internal contradictions? Does the model itself expose and resolve or do you have do some sort of cognitive analysis where you apply the ctmu on the other model to check for consistencies?

[Omniprovement]

Great video. If I may ask, what software do you use for video-editing?

[moussaadem]

13:30 Isn't "true v false = true" just one entry of the truth table defining the "OR" operator ? surely this single entry isn't sufficient to define this logical operator. I just don't see how to derive anything from "true v false = true" other than that "true v false = true", I don't see how to derive "true v true = true" for example.
What am i missing ?